inverse laplace transform of (s^2-3s+1)/(s^3+s^2-2s)
the denominator will be s(s+2)(s-1), but im not sure what to do with the numerator?
tried partial fraction ?
does it split into 3 fractions though? im really trying to remember partial fractions its been so long
yes, it does,... \(\dfrac{s^2-3s+1}{s(s+2)(s-1)}=\dfrac{A}{s}+\dfrac{B}{s+2}+\dfrac{C}{s-1}=\)
know how to find A,B,C ?
umm well to find A you would divide s^2+s-2 into s^2-3s+1?? that doesnt seem right though
first, do this, s^2-3s+1 = A(....) + B (.....) +C (.....) can you fill the blanks ? simple algebra
actually i dont remember this at all, are you talking about just putting the s^2 into the first, and -3s into the second and 1 into the third??
no...i was asking you to make a common denominator for left side, like w/x+y/z = (wz+xy)/xz
FOR RIGHT SIDE***
\(\dfrac{s^2-3s+1}{s(s+2)(s-1)}=\dfrac{A}{s}+\dfrac{B}{s+2}+\dfrac{C}{s-1} \\ \implies s^2-3s+1= A (s+2)(s-1)+Bs(s-1)+Cs(s+2) \) did you get this ???
ohhh yeah, thats what i was saying with s^2+s-2... for A, I guess since you didn't say anything I was confused... but yes, im totally with you.
to find A, put s=0 what u get ?
i just noticed that i typed it in wrong... it is s^2-3s-1. but to find A, are u saying plug in 0 for s and you get -2A and you solve setting that equal to s^2-3s-1... so then just divide by -2
wait then it would be 1/2
ok, then \(s^2-3s-1= A (s+2)(s-1)+Bs(s-1)+Cs(s+2)\) A= 0 -1 =A (-2) yes, A =1/2 correct, now you know how can you find B ?
well first, why did you pick s=0?? you can't use that for B now though
look at this equation closely \(s^2-3s-1= A (s+2)(s-1)+Bs(s-1)+Cs(s+2)\) this is true for every value of 's' now if i want to find A , what value of 's' can i put so that i will not get B and C in calculations ?
gotcha, so to find b we use -2 and to find c we use 1.
absolutely correct!
k, i will get those.
B=3/2 and C=1
c=-1
correct :) now take the inverse LT of individual terms, \(\dfrac{s^2-3s+1}{s(s+2)(s-1)}=\dfrac{1}{2s}+\dfrac{3}{2(s+2)}-\dfrac{1}{s-1}\) can you ?
well then f(x) = 1/2 + 3/2e^-2x - e^-x *just followed the table of inverse LT.
yes, i get the same..... i would have used variable 't' instead..
is there any particular reason why use t instead?
habit.... if F (x) = (....) then use 'x' if F (t) = (....) then use 't' else use any variable...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!