#11 :)
well by looking at the picture what can you figure out?
im trying to get triangle VKO congruent to triangle VZL but i cant get an angle or the 3rd side
well, if you take a different approach to it, you see the triangle VOL is an isosceles, correct?
oh then you can get <1 congruent to <2, but then what?
could i do a linear pair post to get <3 congruent to <4 then get VK congruent to VZ with cpctc
see 1 and 2 are congruent
then LOK and OLZ are congruent 2 sides and 1 angle are congruent of the angle that makes 3rd sides congruent that's kv = vz
2 angles are 2 sides are congruent :) that makes it isosceles right
@Hope_nicole is it correct? m out of geometry practice
Well, when i looked at the picture, i noticed the inner triangle was an isosceles, then i noticed that the two segments at the bottom were congruent also which in my mind made the triangle KVZ an isosceles. However that is not a true way to prove it, at least i do not think so! but yes you are correct :D
it can be proved. you gotta draw line segment for KVZ ne. you are right too
sorry I mean VOL
you got them congruent anyway~
Given: Seg OV ≅ Seg LV Seg KO ≅ Seg ZL Prove: Tri KVZ is isosceles 1. Seg OV ≅ Seg LV 2. < 1 ≅ <2 3. <3 ≅ < 4 3. Supplements of Congruent Angles are Congruent 4. Seg KO ≅ Seg LZ 5. Tri VOK ≅ Tri VLZ 4. SAS ≅ Postulate 6. Seg VK ≅ Seg VZ 7. Tri KVZ is isosceles
@maddierawr
i got it thanks
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!