Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics
11 Online
Just a question regarding Rolle's Theorem that I can't really find an explanation to. (Below)
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
"The function \[f(x) = [1] --- x, 0 \le x <1\]\[f(x) = [2] --- 0, x = 1\] is zero at x = 0and x = 1 and differentiable on (0,1), but its derivative on (0,1) is never zero. How can this be? Doesn't Rolle's Theorem say the derivative has to be zero somewhere in (0,1)? Give reasons for your answer."
rolle's theorem requires that the function must be continuous on the closed interval \[0\leq x \leq 1\], which is not satisfied by your function
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
Aubree:
Guys, what does love feel like? I've been getting a tight chest and when I talk to him my heart rate hangs out around 100-120 beats per min, and when he doe
thereneelg:
ok... anyone have advice?? ...I did Choir all throughout Middle school and have ALWAYS been put in Soprano those three years.
kamariana:
The Byzantine Procopius is known for (5 points) reconquering much of the old Roma
chuckD:
hellp!!! what does it mean to describe a scientist as skeptical Why is sceptical
DoltonCarlee:
So like do y'all know anything about the first world war?
thehearken:
anyone know how to explain this so its easier for me to understand? b(1)=2, b(n)=
1 hour ago
10 Replies
2 Medals
1 day ago
6 Replies
1 Medal
3 days ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
3 days ago
2 Replies
1 Medal
2 days ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
5 Replies
2 Medals