Could someone provide a step by step way to prove the product rule?
Why don't we <puts on shades> @UseInduction ? AWW YEAA haha... couldn't resist, sorry. ;) You still there?
lol yeah
Okay.... let f and g be differentiable functions... we're trying to find... \[\LARGE \frac{d}{dx}f(x)g(x)\] savvy? :D
yeah i know the rule itself and how to use it but the problem is the general proof of it and how to get there :)
So, by definition \[\LARGE \frac{d}{dx}f(x)g(x)=\lim_{h \rightarrow0}\frac{f(x+h)g(x+h)-f(x)g(x)}{h}\]I bet you got this far, at least ^.^
yeah, that's by following the general definition of derivative. got it so far
Well, how did you proceed from here?
are you supposed to just simplify the definition of derivative? :O
thanks if that is true, didn't think of it before you pointed it out :)
Unfortunately, not that simple :) First, I need you to accept this... but it's almost trivial... \[\LARGE \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}f(x+h)=f(x)\]
Any questions so far, @UseInduction ?
nope please continue
Now, we still have to prove that it's equal to f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x) So... What to do... Let's subtract AND add f(x+h)g(x) in the numerator, shall we? \[\large \lim_{h \rightarrow0}\frac{f(x+h)g(x+h)-f(x+h)g(x)+f(x+h)g(x)-f(x)g(x)}{h}\]
Yes? You have a comment and/or a query?
what is the reasoning behind the addition and subtraction?
You'll see. Now, we factor out some terms... by the way, I'll omit the limit part, because it's getting too bulky. \[\Large \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\large \frac{f(x+h)[g(x+h)-g(x)]+[f(x+h)-f(x)]g(x)}{h}\] Following so far? Maybe you can now see why we added and subtracted that term ^.^
Huh... it seems I didn't omit the limit part after all... my bad :D
isnt it to simplify the division by h by getting all terms in the numerator with an h in them
Nope ;)
o well, keep going then :P
So, this time I'll omit the limit part, temporarily... That fraction thingy can be split into two fractions... \[\Large f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}+\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\]Right?
yup
Can't you see it yet? Limit distributes over addition, so... \[\Large \lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[ f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}+\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\right]\]\[\Large \lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[ f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}\right]+\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\right]\]
Sorry \[\Large \lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[ f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}+\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\right]\] \[\Large \lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[ f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}\right]+\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\left[\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\right]\]
ohh i see :) the post before the last post is f(x)g(x)' + f'(x)g(x)
And surely, you can see where this is going now? :)
Well, let me just patch things up... \[\large \lim_{h\rightarrow0}f(x+h)\cdot\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}=\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}f(x+h)\cdot\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}\] Since both limits exist... and this is just equal to \[\Huge f(x)\cdot g'(x)\]right, @UseInduction do something similar to the other term too ;)
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} g(x+h) * \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{ f(x + h) - f(x)}{ h }\] which is equal to g(x) * f '(x). Is this what you meant?
well, almost. Actually, it was \[\large \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\cdot g(x)\] There was no g(x+h) involved :P
close enough
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!