Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
none :P
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Thanks - good answer. LOL.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Thanks timosir
OpenStudy (anonymous):
its a trick question undostres
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I know. Theres nothing on google either.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Maybe recycling ?
OpenStudy (aripotta):
i guess you could go with recycling
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ok.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
some studies show that recycling is worse.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
oh really scientist sir
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
then what?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
because i have to answer this......
OpenStudy (anonymous):
This is a weird question. Because for every positive human impact that we could name, there's another side of the coin.
For example,
we could say that "recycling" is a positive human impact.
But the only reason we need to recycle, in the first place, is because we humans consume natural resources so quickly.
We could also say that the creation of wildlife preserves is a positive human impact.
But then again, humans are a big reason for why many animals are endangered, and need wildlife preserves.