Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Finding solutions for a system from the fundamental matrix. See Below

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[V(t)=\left[\begin{matrix}0 & 4te^-t & e^-t\\ 1 & e^-t & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Verify that v is a fundamental matrix for the system \[x'=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 4 & 4 \\ 0 & -1 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so i found the eigenvalues and then the vectors, but I do not get what they got for V(t). the eigenvalues are 0 and -1, with -1 being a double root. I got the v1(t), when lambda is 0 but i do not get what I was supposed to for when lambda is -1, what am i doing wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The third column, the 4 is supposed to be -4.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@wio

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmmm, I'm not completely sure what is being asked.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is it just a diffeq but with repeated roots?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, if I was given the x'=Ax matrix, and I solved for the eigenvalues and vectors, just like we did last night, and put together the matrix from the three solutions, I should get V(t), but I dont, I get the correct eigenvalues, and I get the correct v1(t) , when lambda is zero, i get (0e^0t, 1e^0t, 1e^0t), which is (0, 1, 1) which is what I am supposed to get for the first column of V(t), but when lambda is -1, I do not get either of those column vectors in V(t).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is your eigen vector for \(-1\)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i get (0, 0, 1)^T

OpenStudy (anonymous):

By the way `\begin{bmatrix}` will auto add brackets.\[ \begin{bmatrix}-2 & 4 & 4 \\ 0 & -2 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & -1\end{bmatrix} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We gotta find the null space in this...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i thought the diagonal is -1 - (-1), so wouldnt both the -2 be 0's

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait! I messed it up...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ \begin{bmatrix}0 & 4 & 4 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\left[\begin{matrix}0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It seems that there are multiple ways of doing this one...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and thats what i end with, x2=0 x3=0, x3=x3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, basically it comes down to how you have to deal with repeated eigen values in diffeqs.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do you do that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The middle row is the only row that is a bit strange.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is what i was thinking to... because i have no idea how they get that t in there.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well if you are given all the solutions like in the V(t), how would we get the A matrix in x'=Ax if it wasnt given already to us?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so from what I've seen, once you find a vector \(v_1\) for a repeated eigen vector, you need to find a new vector \(b\), such that \[ (A-\lambda_1I)b=v_1 \]Then the solution is \[ v_1te^{\lambda_1t}+be^{\lambda_1t} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or so it says in this book...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So we find \(b\)\[ \begin{bmatrix}0 & 4 & 4 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} b = \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where did you get (1, 0, 0) from? I thought the vector was (0, 0, 1) or did I do that wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Because \([c,0,0]^T\) is the null space, the eigenvector.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

maybe I am doing this wrong but I am getting (1, 4, 0)^T

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How are you getting stuff like that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm getting \([0,1/4,0]^T\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhh yes you are right, i see what I did... but I just multiplied by 4, but yes, i got c2 is 1/4, so it would be what you got.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ \begin{bmatrix}0 & 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 &0\end{bmatrix} b = \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \]It row reduces to this, so I guess there are many solutions... this is confusing as hell.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it sure is. And that didn't quite work either... Im wondering if there is a to start from V(t), and find x' .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have to run to the grocery store, if you find anything please let me know, otherwise I will be right back.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Anyway, my full solution is: \[ \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\\ 1 \end{bmatrix}e^{0t}+ \left(\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}te^{-t}+ \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1/4\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}e^{-t}\right) + \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}e^{-t} \]This simplifies to: \[ \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\\ 1 \end{bmatrix}+ \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}te^{-t}+ \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1/4\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}e^{-t} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

which just isn't consistent with their solution.. so I'm confused.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well it would be if the last two vectors were switched.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's strange, because I'm getting:\[ V(t)= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & te^{-t} & 4e^{-t}\\ 1 & 0 & e^{-t} \\ 1 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's not the order of vectors that is a problem, it's the fact that they have a \(t\) in the wrong column.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well i agree with you, i do not see any reason why it wouldnt be what you have there.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_L8RELShNI the guy's voice is kinda annoying, but the video explains it decently

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhhhhhkaaaayyyy, haha, it is kind of annoying, but in this problem the k vector, would be (4, 1, 0), but not sure how to get that, but it was easy to understand, thank you again for your time and help.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!