whats the flux? vector field=xi+2zj+yk; S that portion s is part of the cylinder y^ 2 +z^2=4 in the first octant bounded by x =0,x=3,y=0,z=0(assuming surface S is oriented upward)
Really? It's been staring you in the face, @dan815 :D \[\huge (x,y,z)\rightarrow(r,\theta, z)\] \[\huge r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\]\[\huge \cos(\theta)=\frac{x}r\]\[\huge\sin(\theta)=\frac{y}r\] \[\huge z=z\]
what is that?
Converting from xyz to cylindrical.
i dont get it T_T
so how do i reprsent my cylinder if its like this
|dw:1364951823127:dw|
Nice drawing ^.^ You must understand, I've never heard of flux before :)
u dont need to know that just tell me how i parametrize this cylindrical coords
^I don't know what that means... Maybe I'm not the best person for this question :)
Use the parameterization r(u, v) = <u, 2 cos v, 2 sin v> for u in [0, 3], and v in [0, π/2].
thats what i found on the internet does that make sense to you?
Nope :) What I found is the Gauss-Divergence Theorem. ^.^
yaa this is like that
Well, why don't you just use that? I really hate integrals with circles through them...
@wio your assistance needed plz
If we could just use Gauss' Divergence, it just becomes equal to \[\huge \iiint\limits_V (\nabla \cdot \vec{F})dV\]
well that comes in chapter 9.15 i am still on 9.13 so it wants me to use this method right now
What year are you in, @dan815 ?
2
We need someone that specialises in this sort of evil Integral madness.. definitely not me... I was just using Google earlier :)
wio is like a professor
lol
Well, there are like 4 surfaces here, right?
he always anwers these kind of questiosn for me
If we can't do divergence theorem then we are going to do a ton more work.
i think this is what i need to find
You need help parametrizing the surfaces?
|dw:1364952595768:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!