Write the rational function, f(x), which corresponds to the given characteristics of each graph. 5. zeros: x = 1 vertical asymptotes: x = -2 holes: none horizontal asymptote: y = 1 6: zeros: none vertical asymptotes: x = 3 holes: none horizontal asymptote: y = 0 7. zeros: x = -1 vertical asymptote: none holes: x = -4 horizontal asymptote: none
I'll show you how to do the first one and then you can try to do the others. So I'm sure you know that a rational function is. To find the zeros of one, you have to think about where the top equation would be zero. In this case, it has a zero at x = 1. So the equation for this would be either \[1-x\] or \[x -1\] right? Or some variant because it would still work if it was multiplied by anything. So you know the top of your equation is one of those two. Then to find vertical asymptotes you have to find when the equation is being divided by 0, because then it will never reach that point, but it will get close as x gets infinitely small. So \[2 + -2 = 0\] right? So then, \[2+x = 0\] when x = -2. See where I'm going? Now you have \[\frac{1-x }{2+x } or \frac{x-1}{2+x}\] If you plot both of those, you'll find that one of them fits all of the parameters you gave, whereas the other doesn't have a horizontal asymptote of 1. If you have any questions, go ahead and ask.
what problem was that @A_Gnarly_Narwhal 5, 6 or 7
Sorry I should have explicitly mentioned it. It was the first one , or number 5.
a) zeros: none b) vertical asymptotes: x = 3 c) holes: none d) horizontal asymptote: y = 0 d) says the degree of the numerator must be less than the degree of the denominato c) says there are no common factors top and bottom b) says the denominator has a factor of \(x-3)\) and a) says the the numerator has no zeros simplest version could be \(\frac{1}{x-3}\)
@Mertsj Just #7
How could it have a zero of -1?
it means (-1, 0)
What I was hoping you had learned from those other 2 guys was that a rational function has a 0 if the numerator is 0.
So if x=-1 is a 0, then x+1 must be a factor of the numerator.
would the denominator be x + 4
If I remember right, a hole at -4 meant the function is undefined at -4 but it is a hole instead of an asymptote because the factor cancels out so I think it is: \[\frac{(x+1)(x+4)}{x+4}\]
see I have a problem
Yep
the next problem has everything with it: zero - x = -2 vertical asymptote - x = 1 hole - x = -3 horizontal asymptote - y = 1
So here is your chance to put it all together. Everything you have learned from the other three problems.
I got this so far: \[\frac{ (x + 2) (x + 3) }{ (x + 3) }\]
Is that right?
The vertical asymptote is x=1so there should be a factor of (x-1) in the denominator
I had it right, just I needed to add an (x - 1) in the denominator
Otherwise it looks good.
man I thought I would've gotten that one wrong
You surprised yourself...you are smarter than you thought.
@Mertsj My Answer: (x - 2) / (x - 2) (x - 4) Problem: Zeros: none VA: none Hole: x = 2 HA: y = 4
Is it right @Mertsj
Can't be because the function you wrote would have a zero of 2
Oh no. I just read about the hole.
so changed your answer
Also since the horizontal is y = 4, that means the degrees of numerator and denominator are the same but the ratio of the coefficients of the terms with the highest exponents is 4.
So make the numerator 4(x-2)
I have 1 more for you to check. @Mertsj My Answer: (x +/- 0) (x - 3/2) / (x - 1/2) Problem: Zero: x = 0 VA: x = 3/2 Hole: none HA: y = 1/2
\[\frac{x}{(2x-3)}\]
so was my answer not simplified or something
The horizontal asymptote is x=1/2 which means the degrees of numerator and denominator are equal but the coefficients have ratio 1/2
So that horizontal asymptote does mean you have a factor in either numerator or denominator.
oh I see
|dw:1364874121588:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!