Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Prove that every antisymmetric relation is weakly antisymmetric antisymmetric: if, for all \(x,y \in X\), if \(xRy\) holds, then \(yRx\) does not weakly antisymmetric: if, for all \(x,y \in X\), if \(xRy\) and \(yRx\) hold, then \(x=y\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't think anyone currently online can help you ; I recommend that you try Math Stack Exchange

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@karatechopper can you help?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Proving the contrapositive of this statement might be a little easier to see.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i have a proof from my teacher but i don't understand it. "Since xRy and yRx never happens, it is weakly antisymmetric"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's the only thing she wrote

OpenStudy (anonymous):

While that is correct, I feel like that is "hand waving" a bit.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If you look at contrapositive of what you are trying to prove, it makes a little more sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok how do i do that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You are trying to prove, "If the relation R is antisymmetric, then it is weakly antisymmetric." This is a " P implies Q" type statement. The contrapostive is where you negate each part of the statement, and switch the order. So what I am suggesting to prove is this: "If the relation R is NOT weakly antisymmetric, then it is NOT symmetric".

OpenStudy (anonymous):

er...antisymmetric*. that last word should be antisymmetric.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok, so if R is not weakly antisymmetric, then xRy and yRx hold would imply x\(\neq\)y?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That is correct. Since R is not weakly antisymmetric, there exists an x,y in X such that xRy and yRx hold, but x doenst equal y. Now, it is possible for this relation to be antisymmetric?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no, because xRy AND yRx hold, so this means it's not antisymmetric either.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and thats it! You have shown that if R is not weakly antisymmetric, then R is not antisymmetric. Since this is the contrapostive of what we actually wanted to prove, and the contrapositive of a statement is equivalent to the original statement, we are done. You have proved that if a relation is antisymmetric, then it is weakly antisymmetric.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok thanks i understand it now!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!