How should I find this determinant? Image attached.
Whoever set this on you is a sadist... o.O
Have you tried evaluating it normally? (that must be tough...)
I tried to bring it to the Vandermonde form, whose result is simple.
Suffice it to say, matrices are not my specialty... let's bring in some heavy-hitters... @hartnn
also tried to substract : Line2 - a*Line1, Line3 - a*Line2, but I can't arrive at the result of the wolfram alpha which is> \[abc \times (a-b)^{2} \times (a-c)^{2} \times (b-c)^{2}\]
I will revise my work because I might have made some mistakes in terms of simple calculus... overwhelmed by its huge amount. :)
copy the first 2 columns at the end, then multiply the diagonals \[\begin{vmatrix} a&b&c&|&a&b\\d&e&f&|&d&e\\g&h&i&|&g&h\end{vmatrix}\]
dont bother working out all the multiplications since they might simplify out in the end
mm, you mean using the Rule of Sarrus.
i got no idea what the name is :) (123+234+243)-(333+441+522) i just used the exponents there to keep it cleaner
How do you augment a matrix, @amistre64 ?
augment is just running elementary row operations until you get to a reduced form
No, I mean, how did you typeset an augmented matrix in TeX :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_Sarrus . take a look at the main picture.
i only know how to code up the matrix forms using \begin{} \end{} syntaxes
yeah, that rule :)
Oh well, I doubt I'll use matrices that much anyway :)
ok, thanks for the tip. :)
123 + 234 + 234 - 333 - 441 - 522 i dont see a nice way to simplify that except for expanding them out in a painstaking manner now
yeah, the exercises in this book are quite rude and I got used to the idea.
it might help to know that:\[(a+b+c)(x+y+z)=ax+ay+az+bx+by+bz+cx+cy+cz\] when thats a perfect square you get \[(a+b+c)^2=aa+ab+ac+ba+bb+bc+ca+cb+cc\\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=a^2+b^2+c^2+2ab+2ac+2bc\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!