Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

find the one-sided limits indicated. f(x)={2-3x if x<2 {x-1 if x is greater than or equal to 2 a. lim f(x) approaching 2 from the left b. lim f(x) approaching 2 from the right

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

OK. How far did you get with this? Do you know what the one sided limits are it is asking for, or is it the system that is confusing you?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I havent gotten anywhere with it. I dont know how to do the one sided limits. The whole thing is confusing me.

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

OK. Then let me start with the one side part. It is a pretty simple concept related to the number line. |dw:1365629908333:dw|

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

If I am coming at any point from the left, I start below it on the number line. So for your problem with 2, anything BELOW 2 is the left of 2, and anything ABOVE 2 is the right of 2.

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

Does that much make sense now?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

OK. What the system of equations part means is, when the x value is in a specific range, you use one calculation. when it is in another range, you use the other. So lets start with the left. For the left of 2 it is any value less than 2. So when you look at the system the first part says: 2-3x if x<2 So, for the left of 2, it is the limit of 2-3x when x approaches 2.

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

What limit do you get there? \[\lim_{x\to2^-}2-3x\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-4?

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

Yes! Absolutely! And if you write an answer on paper, remember the - sign I did: \[\lim_{x\to2^-}2-3x=-4\]\(\quad\; \uparrow\) That - right there means from the left.

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

The second part of this is the right of 2, so any number greater than 2. So they are looking at the other part of the composite function. \(x-1\) if \(x\ge 2\) The fact that it is greater or EQUALS to does not matter. In limits, we rarely care what something equals. We want to know where it is going towards, not where it is. So you want the limit: \[\lim_{x\to2^+}x-1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so do i plug in the 2 for x and do 2-1?

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

Yah, linear equations are very easy to evaluate. That is why they are using them for the start of limits from the left and right. \[\lim_{x\to2^+}x-1=1\]\(\quad\; \uparrow\) And again, the sign has meaning here. + means from the right.

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

Another thing they may ask is if the limit exists at 2. Well, for the limit to exist, the limit from the right and left must match. We got 1 and -4. Those are NOT the same, so the limit at 2 does not exist. That is one reason why limits from the right and left are important.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok i think i got it. so there is nothing else left to do to this equation?

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

You have answers for (a) and (b), -4 and 1. That is all they asked. The other thing I said is what they are leading to with this.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

o ok well that wasnt as difficult as I expected thank you

OpenStudy (e.mccormick):

The big confusion is they started talking right and left at the same time they threw out a composite function. It seems like a lot. You just needed to see it broken into parts.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!