Does the triangle in 3 space with vertices (-1,2,3), (2,-2,0) and (3,1,-4) have an obtuse angle? How do I find the angles? How do I justify the answer?
If\[c^2 > a^2 + b^2\]where \(c\) is the longest side and \(a,b\) are two others, then the triangle HAS an obtuse angle.
So first I'll have to find all the distances?
Yes!
But this question is in my 3 Dimensional Space/Vectors chapter, I was wondering can there be any other method to solve the same question using vectors/matrix something like that?
Finding the magnitude of a vector and finding the distance between two points is essentially the same thing.
You can represent the vector which joins \(\left(-1,2,3\right)\) and \((2,-2,0)\) in component form as \(\langle 3,-4,3\rangle\) or \(3{\bf i} - 4{\bf j} + 3{\bf k}\). Find the magnitude of that.
That thing would give you the length of one side. Similarly, represent the vector between \((2,-2,0)\) and \((3,1,-4)\) and then find the magnitude to get the length of the second side.
Are you following me? @Zeerak
Yes! Just worked the problem out!
Greattt! Thanks for the thorough and prompt reply!
Nice! So, what are the values of \(a,b,c\)?
why not just draw the triangle
lol yeah, but that wouldn't qualify as "work" :-)
after you draw it , it is easy to see the sides can be found using Pythagorus
@UnkleRhaukus Do you mean Law of Cosines? It's not a right triangle.
In this case, we can't use the Law of Cosines either.
We don't know the measure of all sides. :-|
But a simple approach, as I said, is to check if \(c^2 > a^2 + b^2\)
oh, wait we are the 3space, (drawing is not going to be easy_
a= rt34 b= rt66 c= rt26
Remember that \(c\) should be \(\sqrt{66}\) since it's the LONGEST side.
Oh yes, wrote b on that side
Check if\[\left(\sqrt{66}\right)^2 > \left(\sqrt{34}\right)^2 + \left(\sqrt{26}\right)^2\]
Yes 66 > 60
It means it has an obtuse angle
So it does have an obtuse triangle.\(\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \boxed{}\)
Does the question ask for the angles as well?
One last thing Parth, I tried to do it first by finding magnitude of (2,-2,0) and (-1,2,3) and then used costheta = u.v / ||u|| ||v|| but it gave me wrong answers
another way to find the angles is using the dot product
I prefer the Law of Cosines but yeah.
No, does not ask for the angles, but if I had to find the angles too, what should i do?
You can use the dot product or the Law of Cosines... I think I like the Law of Cosines a bit too much lol :-P
yeah i would use this formula \[\cos\theta = \frac{u\cdot v}{ \|u\| \|v\|}\]
Yeah, I'd use that formula too :-)
Unkle, it gave me wrong answers
you have already worked out ||u|| and ||v||
i can't see your mistake if i can't see your working
Optional:\[c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab\cos\gamma \]\[b^2 = a^2 + c^2 - 2ab\cos\beta\]\[a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2ab\cos \alpha\]So,\[66 =60 - 2\sqrt{34 \times 26}\cos\gamma \]\[34 = 92 - 2\sqrt{66 \times 26}\cos \beta \]\[26 = 100 - 2\sqrt{66 \times 34}\cos\alpha\]
I'm being too annoying right now with that one. :-|
That's absolutely fine! If I had to use he dot product method, without finding the lengths of the sides can that be done? What I did earlier: ||u|| = \[\sqrt{4+4}\] = rt8 = 2rt2 ||v|| = \[\sqrt{1+4=9}\] = rt14
Because u = (2,-2,0) v = (-1,2,3)
Well, the magnitude of the vectors are just the length of the sides in the triangle...
Remember that \(u\) and \(v\) are vectors, not points.
But Im not getting the same answers by two different methods? Why is that?
Oh yes! u and v are vectors I just cant take the magnitude of two point and treat them as vectors!
Oh Thank you Parth!
You have to find the angle between two vectors. Do you remember the three vectors you got? I gave you one, \(\langle 3,-4,3\rangle \)
You can't treat a point as a vector...
How did you get the lengths of the three sides of the triangle?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!