Help with matrices: If A= [ 1 -1 1] ........[ -1 0 0 ] ........[ 0 -1 1 ] Find the trace of B= 2^(-98) * A^(100) The problem here is to find A^(100), with elements in terms of 2. Any idea, Thanks.
Try A·A and split the result in A+C, then A·A·A=(A+C)·A=A+C+C·A (see what C·A looks like and find out that C·A=A+C too), then A·A·A=2(A+C). Now do: A·A·A·A=2(A+C)·A=2A·A+2·C·A and we know this is: 2(A+C)+2·(A+C)=4(A+C) Once again A·A·A·A·A=4(A+C)·A=4A·A+4·C·A=4(A+C)+4(A+C)=8(A+C) In general, \[A^n=2^{n-2}(A+C)\] for n=100 \[B=2^{-98}·2^{98}·(A+C)=A+C\] then trace(B)=trace(A)+trace(C)
my idea is, try to diagonalize A by finding eigenvalue, eigenvectors and P , use that P to find D (diagonalized A) and then A^n = P-1 D^n P to get A^100, the leftover is easy, just time trace of A^100 by 2^-98 Hope this helps
@hoa Totally agree with your approach. That was my first idea as it is the right method but found out that matrix A cannot be digonalized. Unless I have made a mistake in the calculations, it has two eigenvalues: λ=0 (order two) and λ=2 (single). When trying to get the base for eigenvectors I found out that for λ=0 the number of the base vectors was 1, that is lower than multiplicity (2 for λ=0), which is an indication, as you know, that the matrix cannot be diagonalized.
@CarlosGP. if you cannot diagonalize A to get D, how about J ? I mean Jordan Matrix we can take since we don't have D? We can apply the process on J exactly the way we apply to D. Hope it makes sense to you.
Might be done, and would be a more formal process than the pattern I have found. More tedious too, though
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!