factor difference of two squares. x^4-16 is this correct? (x+2)(x-2)
Have you ever used substitution to do squares? Because technically, these are not squares at this point.
No I have not. The question that I have here says, factor each difference of two square.
Yes, I know what it says. But is \(x^4\) a square when you see it just like that?
I meant in my book.
So did I. I am familliar with the question. I have seen it in a few books, or ones almost exactly like it. Think about this, you know how \((x^m)^n\) works?
yep
So, lets say we take \(x^4\) and call it \((x^2)^2\), that us valid. Then we say, Let \(u=x^2\). Now we can subsitute u inside those ( ) and get: \(u^2-16\) That make sense?
yes
Now you can factor that as a difference of squares and theen subsitute back the \(x^2\)
You almost have it right...you're just forgetting to square you x's, which would give you \[(x^2+4)(x^2-4)\] and then your x=2 and -2, if you needed to find those as well
After you backsubstitute, yes, it would look lie what amberjordan2006. However, the probelm would still not be finished.
|dw:1367641155491:dw| I got this
Yes. And there is \((x^2+4)(x^2-4)\leftarrow\) another difference of squares there. So you end up following the instructions, via a little substitution so you can use the rule for difference of squares. Then you have to do the difference of squares one more time and you are done.
(x+2)(x-2) This is what i got using this rule: (A^2-B^2)=(A+B)(A-B)
Yes. So that takes the place of that term.
thanks
np. I am typing up a summary of it, since I had some time.
To summarize. Use \(u=x^2\) to make it a difference of squares (and make the teacher happy cause it is not really needed.) Use the rule \(a^2+b^2=(a+b)(a-b)\) and get \((u+4)(u-4)\). Substitute back the \(x^2\) for \(u\). Now it is \((x^2+4)(x^2-4)\leftarrow\) Another difference of squares there. So you end up following the instructions and doing it again!. \((x^2+4)\leftarrow\) not a difference of squares or even able to be factored, so done. \((x^2-4)\leftarrow\) a new, second difference of squares so you need to factor it. The end result: \((x^2+4)(x+2)(x-2)\)
got it!
Yah, not too hard. You can see how using \((x^m)^n\) you could do it without the substitution, but subs become important in calculus, so it is good to get a little used to them in algebra.
thanks for your help. I'm scare of calculus! ;-)
Ha! Calculus is easy! 90% of calculus is NOT calculus. It is tons of arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and trigonometry. So the calculus part is generally short and easy. The pain in the anatomy part is using everything else to get it into the right form where you can do that simple step, and then clean it up after that simple step makes a huge mess out of it.
Talk to any professor that teaches calculus. Most people are not getting the calculus wrong. They make mistakes in everything else. Forget to distribute a negative, cancel the wrong thing in a quotent, do trig identities wrong, and so on.
ha! I'll keep that in mind!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!