what is a function that meets these requirments, no vertical asymptote, horizontal of y=0, y intercept (0,1/4)?
OK, what part of this is giving you trouble?
the no vertical asymptote part
No vertical asymptote implies that the domain is all real numbers.
forgot to mention its a rational function
Rational.... aaah....
Well, then there should be no way for the bottom to be 0.
x will never be in the denominator.
@EulersEquation What about \[\frac{x^2+\frac{5}{4}x+\frac{1}{4}}{x+1}\]
Try \(y = \dfrac{1/4}{x^{2}+ 1}\)
e.mccormick, x + 1 cannot go in the denominator, otherwise you have a vertical asymptote at x = -1. However, x^2 + 1 is okay. That would be in keeping with a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.
@e.mccormick, x + 1 cannot go in the denominator, otherwise you have a vertical asymptote at x = -1. However, x^2 + 1 is okay. That would be in keeping with a horizontal asymptote at y = 0.
@EulersEquation Nope. It is a removable. No asymptote.
I was just giving hints. But tkhunny gave the actual solution, so i added it to the graph.
@e.mccormick I like it. You could not have done that at x = 0, as this would violate the Intercept requirement. Right, after the bad idea that 'x' could not appear in the denominator, it seemed prudent to get past that.
\[y = \frac{ 1 }{ x^2 }\] is a good candidate. @tkhunny beat me to it, however.
@tkhunny gets a medal.
No -- mine is wrong because that gives a vertical asymptote at x = 0! Dang!
That's what the +1 is for. The denominator cannot be zero for Real x.
Seeing that I am a 17th century mathematician, I am quite old. Getting too old for this sort of thing.
ha! You are not the 17th century mathematician. You are just his brain child! =P
a wannabe
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!