Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Suppose that \(X_1\), \(X_2\), ..., \(X_n\) are independent, identical, exponential random variables with mean \(\mu ^{-1}\), and let \(X_{(1)}\) be the smallest among all \(X_i\). Why is it P{\(X_{(1)}\) > x} = P{\(X_1\)>x}P{\(X_2\)>x}...P{\(X_n\)>x}?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

if the smallest is larger than x then all are larger than x

OpenStudy (zarkon):

ie if \(X_{(1)}>x\) then \(X_i>x\) for all \(i\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But I don't understand how to get this step \(P(X_{(1)} > x) = P(X_1>x)P(X_2>x)...P(X_n>x)\)

OpenStudy (zarkon):

\[\{X_{(1)}>x\}=\{X_1>x,X_2>x,\ldots, X_n>x\}\] then \[P(\{X_{(1)}>x\})=P(\{X_1>x,X_2>x,\ldots, X_n>x\})\] and by independence we get the product \[P(\{X_{(1)}>x\})=P(\{X_1>x\})P(\{X_2>x\})\cdots P(\{X_n>x\})\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see! Thank you!!!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!