find the derivative of f(x) = 4 / (3x - x^2)
\[f(x)=\frac{ 4 }{ 3x-x^2 }\]
\[\frac{ 4 }{ 3(x+h)-(x+h)^2 }-\frac{ 4 }{ 3x-x^2 }\]
are you using the rules for derivatives or are you still using the limit method?
limit method
ahh its a lot more complicated that way unfortunately give me a sec to write out the work myself to make sure I got it then I'll walk through the process with you
is it just 0, if i use substitution?
wait no, that's just the limit, i need the derivative
It's definitely not zero. If you have an answer you want me to check I can do that a lot quicker.
which limit method are you using there are two.
umm, i didnt learn the one with deltas, but...\[\lim(x>0) \frac{ f(x+h)-f(x) }{ h }\]
are you sure that your formula is not suppose to have h approaching to zero not x?
oh yeah sorry lim(h->0)
so lets write out that formula subbing in the f(x) part.\[\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ \frac{ 4 }{ 3(x+h)-(x+h)^2 }-\frac{ 4 }{ 3x-x^2 } }{ h }\]
rationalize denominators?
yes
\[\frac{ 4(3x-x^2)-4[3(x+h)-(x+h)^2]}{ (3x-x^2)[3(x+h)-(x+h)^2] }\]
the numerator should now be \[\frac{ 4(3x-x^2)-4(3x+3h-x^2-2hx-h^2) }{ (3x-x^2)(3x+3h-x^2-2hx-h^2) }\]
now expand
ok
the numerator I mean we may luck out with the denominator
when i tried the problem before, i got stuck in the denominator algebra
numerator: \[-12h + 8hx +4h^2\]
in fact we do because we have the numerator as \[\frac{ 4(h^2-3h+2hx) }{ (3x-x^2)(3x+3h-x^2-2hx-h^2 }\]
or should i factor the 4 out?
It doesn't truly matter. Either way works fine. It's more standard to factor it out if there is a common factor to pull out.
now for messy denominator
What is more important is that you recognize we can pull an h out now
DON"T DO THAT
IIt's a giant waste of time
yeah, but I need to distribute 3x-x^2
no you don't. Wait for me to type out the full equation one more time and you will see what I mean.
\[\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ \frac{ 4h(h-3-2x) }{ (3x-3x^2)(3x+3h-x^2-2hx-h^2 } }{h }\]
notice the cancellation we can preform now?
The "h" in the very top of the question cancels with the "h" in the very bottom of the question.
I think:well i did it anyways\[9x+9xh-3x^3-6hx^2-3xh^2-3x^3-3hx^2+x^4+2hx^3+h^2x^2\]
so the h on the bottom is really h/1, soo we can multiply the top by 1/h right?
if thats the way you want to think of it sure! The important part is that they cancel.
Since they cancel each other we can stop and ask ourselves if we let h approach zero is there still a problem? Do you think there is?
well, how does the bottom h cancel all the others?
nvm
I guess you see now how the rest of the hs do not cause the denominator to approach zero itself. What is the final answer then? Do try to simplify!
\[\frac{ 2(-3h+2hx+4h^2) }{ 3x-x^2 }\]
because h approaches 0
u can "ignore" h multiplied by any term
\[\frac{ 2 }{ (3x-x^2) }\]
not quite
you are making a mistake in your simplification. Instead of ignoring the h as you put it actually sub in zero everywhere you see the letter h and see how that works for simplification.
\[\frac{ 0 }{ 3x-x^2 }\]
nope here I'll write in the sub for you
\[\frac{ 4(0-3+2x) }{(3x-x^2)(3x+0-x^2-0-0) }\]
I think I switched the signs on the numerator though
crap we seem to have messed up somewhere one sec
nope we are fine! I checked our final answer with a math program on my laptop.
ok thanks!
\[\frac{ 4(2x-3) }{ (3x-x^2)^2 }\]
wait isnt the denominator 2(3x-x^2), and if it is, then we can factor out the 4 to a 2
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!