Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (jack1):

really hard quadratic equation, someone please help?

OpenStudy (jack1):

if flow from a fire hose varies with water pressure, and can be estimated by the equation: \[F = a x^2 + b x + c\] find the least-squares values for the constants a, b, and c with the below data: FLOW (F) 94 118 147 180 230 Pressure (x) 10 16 25 40 60

OpenStudy (jack1):

@amorfide do you guys have a sec? @dumbcow

OpenStudy (jack1):

i know what to do with linear ones, but this is really hard

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't know how to do least-squares

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but I know you can plug in the numbers for three of the points and solve it as a system of equations

OpenStudy (jack1):

yeah...?

sam (.sam.):

Yeah what Peter said

OpenStudy (jack1):

ok so just like a matrix then?

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Well not exactly, because you have to do it for all points... the least squares method minimizes the errors. Been a while since I've done it, but it's vaguely familiar. http://www.efunda.com/math/leastsquares/leastsquares.cfm

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

This is for a parabola http://www.efunda.com/math/leastsquares/lstsqr2dcurve.cfm

OpenStudy (jack1):

@agent0smith that link is brilliant, exactly what i need, thanks man!

OpenStudy (amorfide):

Sorry I can not do this

OpenStudy (jack1):

@amorfide all good, thanks for gettin back to us anyway

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

No prob. I'd try to work through it but it's too late, GL on it.

OpenStudy (jack1):

does this seem right to you guys...? \[F = -0.013406x^2 + 3.58357x + 62.1491\]

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Compare the points to the graph... https://www.google.com/search?q=-0.013406x%5E2%2B3.58357x%2B62.1491&aq=f&oq=-0.013406x%5E2%2B3.58357x%2B62.1491&aqs=chrome.0.57.1312j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 The points from the table above, match up with those points on the graph pretty closely.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Or just plug the x values from this FLOW (F) 94 118 147 180 230 Pressure (x) 10 16 25 40 60 Into your equation, and check you get reasonably close to the actual F values.

OpenStudy (jack1):

i never knew google could do that, cheers man! Yep, going off that, they match really closely, i think I'd be more confidant if I had more that 5 points of data to go off, but it matches what I'm supposed to have

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yeah google is great for graphs, a bit more interaction than wolfram alpha. And like you said, you can't be much more confident because you only have a few points; your line of best fit can only be a best fit for the data you're given.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!