Theorem: A line parallel to one side of a triangle divides the other two proportionately. In the figure below, segment DE is parallel to segment BC and segment EF is parallel to AB. Which statement can be proved true using the given theorem?
Which statement can be proved true using the given theorem? Segment BF = 16 Segment BD = 20 Segment BD = 15 Segment BF = 32
i think its Segment BD=15 but im not sure
can someone please help me?
segment BF = 36 as the ratio of the small triangle to the big triangle is 5:11
small triangle in this case is EFC, large triangle is ABC
ok so BF=16 right?
since its the smaller one?
...no, BF = 36
okay, but thats not one of my options.
the line BC = 66 and the segment FC = 30, so the segment BF = 36
so that's eliminated 2 possible answers, now we focus on the line BD
ok so since BF= 36 now we need to find BD right?
i believe the answer is BD=15 but im not completly sure?
so as it's a parallelogram, the line EF = line BD
so should we use pathogoream theroem to find EF?
sorry dude, wifi dropped out for a sec
oh its okay thanks for coming back
back now no just use the ratio, it's easier if BD = 20, then AB = 38 so is that a 5:11 ratio?
yes
no, a 5: 11 ratio on 20 would be a side length of 44 for AB
oh yeah true that
so the answer is bd=20 right?
so we'll try the 15 15 + 18 gives us a length AB of 33 and a 5: 11 ratio of 15 gives us: 15/5 = 3 x 11 = 33 matches success, answer's segment BD = 15
oh so i was right from the start? ha
yep, props, but now you can prove why
yes thank you alot i dont know if you could maybe help me on some other problems ill post them
sure dude, shoot
okshould i post them in the chat or new post?
nah keep it going here is fine
ok cool one sec
Hillary is using the figure shown below to prove Pythagorean Theorem using triangle similarity. In the given triangle ABC, angle A is 90o and segment AD is perpendicular to segment BC.
Which of these could be a step to prove that BC2= AB2 + AC2? Segment AD : segment CD = segment BD : segment AD, since triangle ADB is similar to triangle CDA. Segment AC : segment DA = segment BC : segment AC, since triangle ABC is similar to triangle DAC. Segment BC : segment AC = segment AC : segment DC, since triangle ABC is similar to triangle DAC. Segment BD : segment BA = segment BA : segment CA, since triangle ADB is similar to triangle CDA.
i thought it was choice 3 can you check if im right?
am i right?
so what im getting is that the similar triangles are ABC is to DAC so line DA (small tri) is some ratio of AB, line AC (small Tri) is the hypotenuse, similar to BC which leaves DC (small tri), the smallest side, a ratio of AC
yeah man, looks like you're spot on there with option 3
lets go im on a roll! next question?
shoot, but last one, i got a couple of my own i need to post for an assignment
ok last one its kind of long though you think yyou can help me?
yeah, lets do it
awesome ok one sec
The figure below shows a kite labeled PQRS.
Write a 2-column, paragraph, or flow-chart proof to show that vertex angles of a kite are bisected by the diagonal.
this one i have no idea how to do it, so ima need your help big time. can you give me like all the steps?
hmm tell me what a vertex angle is first?
angle formed by 2 legs?
and i thought a diagonal was a line going across... this may sound stupid, but diagonally
ok, so the angle at P and the angle at R... yeah?
yes
that's easy enough then any quadrilateral (4 sided figure) will have 4 angles that will each be less than 180 degrees, and all 4 will always add up to 360 degrees, in the same way that any triangle is made up of 3 angles, each will be less than 180 degrees and the sum of them will always be 180 degrees
so what are the steps i would need to prove it?
so provided the length of side PQ = PS and RQ = RS, then angle Q must = angle S
thats the given?
it has to be assumed, as it's the only way the vertical line could equally bisect the angles P and R
|dw:1368539666465:dw|
ok, sounds good, hey jack, do you possibly think you could right the paragraph proof for me? its my last question and test has to be in soon.
its usually denoted by these symbols, the lines with the single dash through them are the same length as other lines with a single dash through them, and same goes for lines with double dashes = length of other lines with double dashes
ok.
so how can i write the paragraph proof?
thank you for helping me by the way your very helpful :)
flow chart proof length PQ = Length PS and lenght RQ = length RS therefore angle Q = angle S therefore as line RP is same length in both triangle PQR as for PSR and angle Q = angle S and Side PQ = Side PS and Side RQ = Side RS you have 2 triangles with exactly the same dimensions, 3 equal sides, and one known equal angle
which means that angle P and angle R must be perfectly bisected by line RP, or else you wouldn't have equal dimensions in your triangle side lengths
thats the whole answer? for the flow proof chart?
yes... providing they're mirrored triangles (PQ = PS = true) if not then they're reflected triangles, and the angle of the LH triangle at P = angle of the RH triangle at R, and vice versa
ok thanks im going to put all this info in my own words. thanks alot
sweet, good luck dude
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!