Solving Inverse Functions: Evaluate http://prntscr.com/15e7ec Unsure how to solve inverse functions :(
@primeralph over here
do you know calculus?
Yeah. I do.
is this a topic under calc?
ever heard of Lagrange inversion theorem?
i know the equation is \[(f ^{-1})'(a)=\frac{ 1 }{ f'(f ^{-1}(a)) }\] and that in order to solve it, I need the derivative, which is \[f(x) = \sqrt{x^3+x^2+ x+ 1} \rightarrow f'(x)= \frac{ (3x^2+2x+1) }{ 2\sqrt{x^3+x^2+x+1} }\]
But im not sure what to look for after...
chill
you are not looking for the inverse function
you are looking for the derivative of the inverse at \(x=2\)
@satellite73 I've been thinking of a way to make that easier to state. In my opinion, you can flip the differential
so the first step is to see if you can find \(f^{-1}(2)\)
@satellite73 non-numerically, that might be hard...........
you can do it in your head
\(f(1)=2\) so \(f^{-1}(2)=1\)
To find the inverse at 2, i see which value of x for f(x) gives me 2?
so your real job is now this find the derivative of \(f\) evaluate it at 1 take the reciprocal that is all
@satellite73 I think the person needs a more analytic approach..........without assumptions.............
...........that's the hard part.........maybe Lagrange?
@primeralph heck no! that is what this problem is all about understanding and using \[(f ^{-1})'(a)=\frac{ 1 }{ f'(f ^{-1}(a)) }\]
it is meant to be easy find \(f^{-1}(2)=1\) then find \(\frac{1}{f'(1)}\) finished
@satellite73 crap! it's actually numerical from the start..........missed that kinda
So basically you're working backwards.. you're given an output and you find a value of x that satisfies the value given. Correct?
yes
@Jhannybean yeah, that's the def of an inverse
Oh Okay, that's what I was concerned with. it's not solving the equation that got to me, it was more along the lines of using \[(f ^{-1})(2)\]
@Jhannybean as soon as i saw this Solving Inverse Functions: in your question, i knew you were on the wrong path your job is not to find the inverse function, then find the derivative of the inverse etc etc your job was only to find \(f^{-1}(2)\) and use \[\frac{1}{f'(1)}\]
...I forgot what it meant. And using Stewart's 7th edition calc only tells me the proof of the differential equation.
it is easy once you know the trick the reason i know this is only because i have seen it repeatedly
it is clear of course that if you could not find \(f^{-1}(2)\) you could not do this problem so fast
I see.Thank you. Oh haha. Its appeared on my practice final exam study guide and i've forgotten how to apply \[f ^{-1}(x)\]
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!