Could someone help me figure out these limits on the graph? Don't understand how to do it. Will attach pic.
I don't understand how to calculate the limit with the graph.
Its tedious looking at it from the picture.
hehehl, the picture is "viewable", but can't see the "subscript" for the number "x" is going to
Omg, I hated pre-calculus in HS.
Right, very small...but in general....say for example it says \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 2^+}\] meaning limit as x approaches 2 from the right (positive) side that means....look at your graph.....starting from the RIGHT side of the x axis (a.k.a numbers BIGGER than 2) and go down to the number 2 on the x-axis....now look at the graphed function....what value does it look like it has? *hint* it CAN be different if say it was \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 2^-}\] meaning limit as x approaches x from the left (negative) side
edit in that last sentence **limit as x approaches 2 from the left (negative) side
for example, say a) \(\large x\rightarrow 0^- \) what do you think? @LucyLu15
@jdoe0001 it wouldnt exist?
so, why it doesn't exist?
it wouldnt exist because it has no point?
hehe what does \(\large x\rightarrow 0^- \) stand for?
x approaching 0 from the left side.
just think about it like this........follow the lines in the function from the left side until you get to x = 0 ....what does it look like the line is equal to?
right, so let's look at "x" when it's less than 0, say -9/10, -8/10, -5/10, -2/10, -1/10, -1/100, -1/1000 do they exist?
they do not?
look at the graph :|
looks like a solid line from -9/10 to -1/100000
solid and continuos I'd say
yes, I see that.
so :)
wouldn't be the same for 0 approaching from the right? and then 0 as x approaches 0?
no, "limits" have a direction, when you go to the "left", you don't pay attention to the "right", and the other way around
I'd say when you go FROM the left, you don't pay attention to the right or you only focus forward
you don't look BEHIND per se :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!