Given that Line JK is parallel to MN, show that Triangle JKL = LMN. Justify reasoning.
|dw:1369329497006:dw|
And they are just goving parallel, not congruent?
If all you have is \(JK\| MN\) then this is also possible: |dw:1369330046140:dw|So I am wondering if something else is shown or stated.
This is exactly the information I was given. JK is parallel to MN, show the JKL is congruent to LMN and justify the reasoning.
Order is also important. JKL is not congruent to LMN. I can show that any JKL is similar to any NML, but whout at least a congruency mark in the drawing, it is hard to do more.
JKL=LMN means \(\measuredangle J=\measuredangle L_{KJ}\), \(\measuredangle K=\measuredangle M\), \(\measuredangle L_{MN}=\measuredangle N\), \(\overline{JK}=\overline{LM}\), \(\overline{JL}=\overline{LN}\), and \(\overline{KL}=\overline{MN}\). With just parallel and nothing else, you can see my drawing contradicts this. If there was a | or \(\|\) through at least one set of lines, it would be a completely different issue.
Argh... got my angle L measures backwards. I added the subscipts last to clarify and reverse them. Sorry about that.
|dw:1369331091159:dw|
No it doesn't
Then they are saying for any \(\triangle JKL,\) and \(\triangle LMN\) where \(JK\| MN\), JKL=LMN, which I was able to contradict with my drawing. There is something wrong with what is given.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!