Suppose f(x) --> 150 and g(x) -->0 with g(x)<0 as x--> 3. Determine lim as x-->3 f(x)/g(x).
lim (f/g) = 150/(some really small negative number) = -infinity you can make up a table for y = 150/x for values of x < 0 and you'll see y becoming a larger and larger negative number
@jim_thompson5910 I don't understand why you do 150/x though.How am i supposed to know to ignore g(x)-->0 and put in x, but for f(x) just use 150? Thanks
well since f(x) --> 150 as x--> 3, this means that the limit of f/g will have you replace f with 150 the same will apply to g(x) as well...but you'd get 0 in the denominator, which is undefined
so what you have to do is use a table to see what happens to the y values as x gets closer and closer to 0 you use the equation y = 150/x to make the table
and you'll be looking at x values less than 0
Right that makes sense, so as x gets further and further away from 0 (more negative), y gets closer and closer to 0, but still negative just very small. Is that the right way to think about it?
Since if x=-1, then y=-150. If x=-2, then y=-75, and so on?
but you're getting x closer and closer to 0
if x = -1, then y = -150 if x = -0.1, then y = -1500 if x = -0.01, then y = -15000 if x = -0.001, then y = -150000 etc etc
Oh, why is x getting closer and closer to 0? Also whats the point of x--3? Seems irrelevant to the problem.
no it's relevant, I'm just referring to g(x) as x
basically it should be as g(x) ---> 0, f(x)/g(x) ---> -infinity since g(x) < 0
Nevermind i understand why we do smaller x values getting closer to 0. However i still dont understand x--> 3
I was using y = 150/x because it's easier to write out
I got that part, but whats the 3 have to do with anything.
not much really, all we care about is what f(x) and g(x) are approaching
Thats what confuses me. It makes sense though now, Thanks, i appreciate it.
the only thing the x --> 3 has to do with is the fact that f(x) ---> 150 as x ---> 3 and g(x) ---> 0 as x ---> 3
then they ask what does f/g approach as x ----> 3
so that's the only real use of the "x ---> 3" part
Oh okay, since g(x) is limited by g(x)<0, the 3 could be replaced by any positive number really, and the problem would be the same.
yeah you could easily replace all the '3' numbers with '10' or something and it wouldn't matter
Gotcha, Thanks again.
same with 150 since that doesn't affect the answer of -infinity either
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!