\[\Huge \color{red}{LOG_ IN}\]
Hmm -- that's actually very hard to read.
\[\large \log_12\log_21\log_31\log1_3...\log_{n-1}n=x\log _12\log_23\log_34...log _n(n-1)\]
is it ok now
\[ \log_12\log_21\log_31\log1_3...\log_{n-1}n=x\log _12\log_23\log_34...log _n(n-1)\]
:) color is soo much better
What does it even matter, this part \[ \log_12\log_21\color{red}{\log_31}\log1_3...\log_{n-1}n=x\log _12\log_23\log_34...log _n(n-1)\] is already zero -.-
yes thats correct ...mistake
wait its actually last one \[\log_12\log_21\log_31\log_13...\log_1n=x\log _12\log_23\log_34...\log _n(n-1)\]
You still have a \(\large \log_31\) there...
Wait a minute... what is this even supposed to mean? \[\log_12\log_21\log_31\color{red}{\log_13}...\log_1n=x\log _12\log_23\log_34...\log _n(n-1)\] You know that that doesn't exist... -.-
sry this is what i want let me explain how i wanted to phrase this ?
Hit me
\[\log_12\log _21\log_13\log_31 ...\log_1(n)\log_n1\] such that if i use the property \[\log _ab=\frac{ 1 }{ \log _ba }\] hence \[\log_12\frac{ 1 }{ \log _12 }\log _13\frac{ 1 }{ \log _31 }...\log_1n \frac{ 1 }{ \log_1 n}=1\]
Why is there even a log base 1 ?
so i see\[\log_12=x \implies 1^x=2\implies \emptyset\]
yup
how can i phrase such a question to work is it \[\log_23\log_32\log_45\log_54...\log_n(n+1)\log_{n+1}n\]
These pairs (in respective colour) are all just equal to 1... \[\color{red}{\log_23\log_32}\color{green}{\log_45\log_54}...\color{blue}{\log_n(n+1)\log_{n+1}n}\]
yes exaclty
Well, that seems to be it for this particular mess of logs :P
DO YOU KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH RIGHT HAND SIDE
right hand side also has a log base 1
IF YOU APPLY CHANGE OF BASE YOU HAVE \[\log _ab=\frac{ \log b }{ \log a }\] with the same reasoning we only have\[nx=1\]
of course i will have to start again at an interger more than one
right
uhh...
The RHS is daunting... might need to get a second opinion on that :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!