Let A is a 4x4 matrix such that A(0,1,0,1)^t=(0,1,0,1)^t and A(1,0,1,0)^t=(-1,0,-1,0)^t. Also, suppose A has trace 4 and det 9/4. Find all eigenvalues of A and their multiplicites and explain why (1,1,1,1) is not an eigenvector of A.
the two equations A(0,1,0,1)^t=(0,1,0,1)^t and A(1,0,1,0)^t=(-1,0,-1,0)^t. tell you 2 of the eigenvalues (and vectors): 1 and -1 the trace is the sum of the eigenvalues the set is the product of the eigenvalues
**the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues
All i'm confused about it the information at the beginning
of the question
how do you already know two eigen values?
A(0,1,0,1)^t=(0,1,0,1)^t where t means transpose is a way to write \[A \left[\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1\\0 \\1\end{matrix}\right]= 1 \cdot \left[\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1\\0 \\1\end{matrix}\right]\]
yea i understood that before.
which should look familiar: \[ A v = \lambda v\]
ohhhhhh
yep. so the other would be -1. get ya
yep now its easy to get lamda3 and lamda4
yes. for the last part, [1 1 1 1] is a linear combination of the two eigenvectors they give you.
yea. it looked obvious by looking at it from the beginning. thanks for starting me off!
alright. so i found that lamda=1,-1,9/2,-1/2
then does this mean their multiplicities are just 1?
yes, all eigenvalues are distinct, so you have 4 eigenvalues, with multiplicity of 1 for each (a repeated value would give a multiplicity > 1)
yea. how would you represent in mathematical terms? or is what you wrote sufficient?
what I wrote should be sufficient
so with b) (1,1,1,1)=(0,1,0,1)+(1,0,1,0) hence this is a linear combination of the two basis hence not an eigen vector?
yes
is it right to say that (0,1,0,1) and (1,0,1,0) are eigenbasis's?
yes
but each of them are eigen vectors?
yes, the 4 distinct eigenvectors (because you have 4 distinct eigenvalues) make up a basis in 4d
legend.
thanks phi
thanks phi
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!