Find the tangent plane to the surface x^2+y^2+xyz=4+z^3(y-2x) at the point (1, 1, 1). So the equation of the tangent plane is z-z0=f'x(x-x0)+f'y(y-y0). I find the partials using implicit differentiation: f'x=(2x)/(3yz^2-6z^2-y) @ (1,1,1) = -1/2 f'y=(2y)/(3z^2-6xz^2-x) @ (1,1,1) = -1/2 Then the equation of the plane (ie plugging into the above equation) is z+(1/2)x+(1/2)y=2 But the answer is 5x+2y+4z=11 I have two question from here: 1, Where am I going wrong in the implicit differentiation? Wolfram gives me a different result. 2, I know using this method is incorrect. Why is that? Why must I use the gradient vector to the level surface instead of implicitly deriving?
I'm not sure what you mean by that, the way I would solve this would be to define F(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+xyz-z^3(y-2x) solve for gradF and dot gradF with <x-x0, y-y0, z-z0>
This is calc III by the way
I'm not so confused about the problem itself but rather why these two methods are not equivalent
And also, why wolfram gives me a completely different partial derivatives when solved implicitly. I have no idea where I am going wrong
So where \(f(x, y, z) = (x^2+y^2+xyz) - (4+z^3(y-2x))\) The surface you are considering is \(f^{-1}(0,0,0)\) So the method you discussed earlier is the only reasonable one I can think of. That is where you consider the vectors orthogonal to the gradient at a given point on the level set.
In our textbook, they taught us how to find the equation of a tangent plane for z=f(x,y) using the formula z-z0=f'x(x-x0)+f'y(y-y0). What I'm trying to do is define my equation above as a implicit equation with z(x,y). So I use the process of implicit partial differentiation to find f'x and f'y and plug into the equation for the tangent plane. I don't know why that isn't equivalent to what you just wrote down
That is my real question. I understand the method you outlined but I don't get why that wouldn't be equivalent to the method I just described above
The way I define the equation would be: x^2+y^2+xyz(z,y)=4+(z(x,y))^3 (y-2x) So z is implicitly a function of (x,y) And wondering now why my solution for the first partials of this equation are wrong according to wolfram.
The methods are indeed equivalent, my partial derivatives were incorrect. I found the correct partial derivatives and arrived at the right answer. Thanks for the help
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!