Group theory: Let G be finite and let H be a subset if G. Let identity be in H. Prove that if H is closed with respect to its operation, then it is closed with respect to inverses.
Something without induction.
This sounds like something you could use Lagrange's theorem on... it follows that \(H\) is a subgroup of \(H\), and by Lagrange's theorem you know that there exists some \(n\) for every \(a\in H\) s.t. \(a^n=e\in H\). It follows that \(a^{n-1}\) would be the inverse of \(a\) and must be in \(H\) since \(H\) is closed.
I don't know a full proof but I think that approach makes sense.
OOPS! \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\).
I don't see the logic that (a^n)^(-1) must be in H
that notation only makes sense if we know the inverse is there to begin with.
Yeah @zzr0ck3r
$$a^n=e\\aa^{n-1}=e\\a^{n-1}a=e$$so \(a^{n-1}\) is the inverse of \(a\). Since \(H\) is closed under our operation we know \(a\in H\implies a^{n-1}\in H\)
um a*a^(n-1) = a^n
and again you are saying its there but not proving it
yes and \(a^n=e\) by Lagrange's theorem for some \(n\) that divides \(|G|\).
don't kill me if it's not right lol I don't have much experience with group theory or abstract algebra
I don't think this works, because you are just saying that e is in H and if e is in H of course its inverse is in H
nah nah its cool , its a good place to start.
its not homework, I just wanted to prove it to make my final easy next week:)
I have a proof with induction, It seems there should be something easier as the idea seems so obvious.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!