How to evaluate gamma function at n? \[\Gamma(n)=\int\limits_{0}^{\infty}e^{-t}t^{n-1}dt\] But how do we find gamma(1) or something (using this identity)?
If you want gamma(1), you replace n with the value of 1. In general, you evaluate the integral (treating n as a constant and t as a variable). The result will be a function of n
When the integral is evaluated, you will have gotten rid of the t's, so gamma(n) will have only n as a variable.
Yes, but how do you evaluate the integral?
Can't help you in that. I don't remember how you can solve it. Sorry
Newton-Leibniz formula to the rescue !
we ca forget the intergral and consider the defination \[\Gamma (n)=(n-1)!\] for any n we can evaluate this
ok, but what about for say n = 1.5?
how ever the improper integral also can be used to i will prove for \[\Gamma(1/2)\]
\[\Gamma(\frac{ 1 }{ 2 })=\int\limits _0^{\infty}x^{1/2}e^{-x}dx\] \[\text{ let u=x^2 then } \implies 2 \int\limits_0^{\infty}e^{-u^2}du=2(\frac{ \sqrt{\pi} }{ 2 })=\sqrt{\pi}\]
for fractions it gets weird but using the fact that e^-x^2 is sqrt of pi we can solve alot of fraction problems
why let u = x^2?
sry i meant x=u^2
wich means u=x^1/2
ok. How did you get from the integral to the next step?
Before you answer that, does it involve anything beyond high school maths?
that requires a new idea not offered in high school math ,its a special function critical to probability
If it's not to difficult, would you care to expand?
^too
Oh, this is the error function...right, I've heard a bit about this.
yes
when you substituted x = u^2, dx = 2u du right? So then where did the u go in the next step?
you are correct \[2u du=dx\implies \] \[\int\limits _0^{\infty}e^{-x} \color{green}{x^{\frac{ -1 }{ 2 }}dx}=\int _0^{\infty} e^{-x}x^{-1/2}u2du=\int _0^{\infty} e^{-u^2}u^{-1}u2du\] another mistake we have \[x^{1-1/2}=x^{-1/2}\]\
i had made a substitution mistake ealier its -1\2 not 1\2
so th u cancel
Yeah...I'm getting the gist of it. Can we generalise this to any value of n?
i was wondering about that first we need to consider integers (already fine cos we will use factorial!)then we need to look at numers of the form p/q i guess with 1/2 we where just lucky in normal cases the x remaines as parrt of the intergral ,but we can always generalize for \[\Gamma(n/2)\]
So you can do it? What if I gave you like n = 1913/17 or something? or what if n = pi?
its particular values can be expressed in closed form for integer and half-integer arguments, but no simple expressions are known for the values at rational points in general
So you can't do exact values for anything that isn't an integer or half integer?
exaclty,as you say it ,mostly rational numbers are approaximated
Interesting... Thanks heaps for all that by the way
yw,are you really in high school
yeah. Year 11
great,good work and keep it up...sure you wont have problems when you meet up with integrals at college???
Haha thanks! Actually I'm already doing integrals...it's part of the Australian curriculum
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!