Ask your own question, for FREE!
Algebra 11 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

suppose y varies directly with x. if y=-3 when y=5,find y when x=-1

OpenStudy (dan815):

i think something wrong in ur question

OpenStudy (dan815):

suppose y varies directly with x. if y=-3 when X*?=5,find y when x=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think that the answer is y=3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x y -1 3 0 2 1 1 2 0 3 -1 4 -2 5 -3

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

If y varies directly with x, then \(y = kx\), \(k\) some constant. \(-3 = k *5\rightarrow k=-\frac{3}{5}\) \(y = k(-1)\)\[y = -\frac{3}{5}(-1) = \frac{3}{5}\] @cahayes9498 with direct variation, you've just got a straight line, and the slope is \(k\). Here \(k = -\frac{3}{5}\) so the line slopes down and to the right. Your table would be correct if we knew that \(k = -1\), but it doesn't, so the relationship between x and y is not correct.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@whpalmer4 you have me completely lost now, where is the K coming in at?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Any variation problem has a scale factor in there. We have to find it using the initial data. So, because it is direct variation, we know the form is \(y = kx\). If we double \(x\), \(y\) also doubles. That's direct variation. Now, the reason the \(k\) factor is there is so we can have direct variation between any possible pair of \(x\) and \(y\) values. Say I had two quantities that exhibited direct variation, but when the \(x\) value was 1, the \(y\) value was 3. How do you make that happen, except by a scale factor? You can't just add (which is what your table did) because then doubling \(x\) won't double \(y\).

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Looking at it another way: with this problem, we knew that y = -3 when x = 5. Well, if it is direct variation, then doubling \(x\) must also double \(y\). If we evaluate my function at x = 10, we get \(y = -\frac{3}{5}(10) = -6\) which is twice the value it is at x = 5. With your table, y would = -8, and that isn't a doubling of what it was at x = 5.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Does that make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok I understand it now, yes it makes sense now

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Good! Are you comfortable with the difference between direct, indirect and joint variation?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Also good. Each of them will have that pesky \(k\) in the numerator.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Have you taken any physics classes?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Lots of variation examples there, and although the variation constant isn't usually called \(k\), it's always there. Perhaps the most obvious one is Newton's F=ma — for a given mass, the acceleration a and force F vary directly, and m serves as the variation constant.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no I have not

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Another example might be the distance formula: distance = speed * time. If you go at a steady speed, the distance varies directly with the time. Double the time, double the distance. Here the speed is the variation constant. I think I've beaten this horse to death, or at least bored it :-)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!