Case challenge! Space Accident.
On board a space station there is a small explosion. The explosion gives a number of small holes in the space station. As head you should decide whether evacuation is necessary. The space station measures 55 m x 12 m x 3m. There are 250 holes from the explosion and the average area of each hole is 1.0 mm2. The technicians aboard promises that they can put a plate over the area with the holes in 12 hours. The air in the space station is a mixture of O2 (40%) and N2 (60%) with a total pressure of 0.5 atm so that the partial pressure of O2 under normal conditions is 0.2 atm. In order to live, people requires a partial pressure of O2 between 0.1 atm. and 0.3 atm. We can assume that the molecular mass of O2 and N2 are the same and equal to 32 g / mol. The temperature of the space station is 295K. It is now your mission to decide if evacuation is necessary using calculations. Creative answers are also more than welcome :) Requirements to solve the problem: Be familiar with infinitesimal calculus (differential calculus and integral calculus) Be familiar with Graham's law of effusion. Have some imagination. :)
sounds like a great problem that you and some friends should talk about over coffee or something
Well when I had to do the problem it was my teacher that was testing my trivia in phys chem.
Wtf
so i got the rms velocity of 479 m/s at 295 K, since they weigh the same, it's the same for both N2 and O2. I just don't know how to find the flow rate through the hole.
would that be the way of going about it? ps. didn't write that, it's from MIT
ill just sit a drink juice
False
What are you trying to determine in this question?
if they should evacuate the station, more specifically, if the partial pressure of oxygen in the station will decrease below 0.1 atm in next 12 hours following.
In reality, I would think they should evacuate :p
sooo i've been doing more thinking.. volume and pressure the moles of gas (N2 and O2)=40896.07 since thats at the partial pressure of oxygen of 0.2 atm, the total loss of gas should not be of 20448.04 moles. Dividing by 250 (holes) the by 12 (hrs) and 60 (min), i arrived at a max flux that should not exceed 0.1136 moles/min*hole I would say that the initial flux rate cannot exceed this value, because the rate will slow down as the pressure decreases, so as long as the initial rate is not higher than 0.1136 moles/min*hole, there will be P(O2)>0.1 atm for the next 12 hours ... i still don't know how to find the rate of gas flow though.
If I had to convert the text problem into math we are interested in following expression: \[\LARGE rate _{pressure}=\frac{ dp }{ dt }\]
Lets approximate and assume O2 and N2 are ideal gasses: \[\LARGE pV=nRT\] \[\LARGE pV=\frac{ N }{ N _{A} }RT\] \[\LARGE N=\frac{ pVN _{A} }{ RT }\] \[\LARGE dN=d \left( \frac{ pVN _{A} }{ RT } \right)=\frac{ VN _{A} }{ RT } dp\] \[\LARGE dp=\frac{ RT }{ VN _{A} } dN\] \[\LARGE \frac{ dp }{ dt }=\frac{ RT }{ VN _{A} } \frac{ dN }{ dt }\] Now we have an expression for the rate where dN/dt is Graham's law of effusion.
Use Graham's law of effusion and use separation of variables along with integration over the right lengths.
Forgot to write you need to be familiar with Knudsen method too b/c then you can write Graham's law of effusion as: \[\LARGE -\frac{ dN }{ dt }=\frac{ pA _{0} }{ \sqrt{2 \pi mkT} }=\frac{ pA _{0}N _{A} }{ \sqrt{2 \pi MRT} }\] last equal sign is true b/c: \[\LARGE R=N_{A}k\] \[\LARGE M=mN _{A}\]
ohh sweet, dude. you took the situation in terms of change in pressure not the loss of gas ! I actually saw that last formula somewhere and i figured that in order to do the question you had to derive it from Graham's law. Thanks for posting the question, i liked this.
It is not done yet! :D you can do the rest :)
But you are right @aaronq when you say evacuation is not needed. so nice :D
haha woo for not evacuating and abandoning the mission. i guess i'll have to try to finish this up later
@aaronq If you like I can try derive the effusion rate (dN/dt) as I've written it?
awesome dude ! thanks for writing this out :)
The only problem with it is that I do not know how to show it is -dN/dt... :/ can only show it is the rate using a drawing.
whatever, this is good enough dude lol i'm gonna try going through the derivation, this might come in handy one day
It is just a try so there may be mistakes.
okay, if i find something that seems funny, i'll let you know. How's your summer?
OMG...This is truly a total challenge lol :P Interesting though! Well from what I could follow at least hahaa :P
\[\LARGE \frac{ dp }{ dt }=\frac{ RT }{ VN _{A} } \frac{ dN }{ dt }\] \[\LARGE \frac{ dp }{ dt }=\frac{ RT }{ VN _{A} } \frac{ -pA _{0}N _{A} }{ \sqrt{2 \pi MRT} }\] \[\LARGE \frac{ dp }{ dt }=\frac{ -pA _{0} }{ V }\frac{ RT }{ \sqrt{2 \pi MRT} }=\frac{ -pA _{0} }{ V }\sqrt{\frac{ RT }{ 2 \pi M }}\] Seperation of variables: \[\LARGE \frac{ 1 }{ p } dp=\frac{ A _{0} }{ V }\sqrt{\frac{ RT }{ 2 \pi M }} dt\] To make this a bit more easy we define a new function (just to make the integration more simple): \[\LARGE \tau = \frac{ A _{0} }{ V }\sqrt{\frac{ RT }{ 2 \pi M }}\] It most then follow that: \[\LARGE \frac{ 1 }{ p } dp=\tau dt\] We integrate this from the time 0 to t and the pressure to the time 0 (p_0) to the pressure to the time t (p_1): \[\LARGE \int\limits_{p _{0}}^{p _{1}} \frac{ 1 }{ p } dp=\int\limits_{0}^{t}\tau dt\] TO BE CONTINUED.
Correction: \[\LARGE \frac{ 1 }{ p } dp=-\tau dt\] \[\LARGE \int\limits\limits_{p _{0}}^{p _{1}} \frac{ 1 }{ p } dp=\int\limits\limits_{0}^{t}-\tau dt\]
We solve the integrals (remember that tau is not depending on t): \[\LARGE \ln(p _{1})-\ln(p _{2})=-\tau t\] \[\LARGE \ln \left( \frac{ p _{1} }{ p _{0} } \right)=-\tau t\] We take the exponential function on both sides: \[\LARGE \frac{ p _{1} }{ p_{0} }=e ^{-\tau t}\] We then get: \[\LARGE p _{1}=p_{0}*e ^{-\tau t}\] Substutite the expression for tau: \[\LARGE p=p _{0} \exp \left(- \frac{ A _{0} }{ V }\sqrt{\frac{ RT }{ 2 \pi M }}*t \right)\] This most be our final equation as it contain only known variables.
Sorry I make some mistakes :/ \[\LARGE \ln(p _{1})-\ln(p _{0})=-\tau t\]
great @Frostbite !
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!