let a subscript 1 be a positive real number. Define a sequence a subscript n recursively by a subscript n +1 = a^2 subscript n -1. show that a subscript n does not converge to zero. Is there a subscript 1 such that the sequence a subscript n converges to some non-zero value?
wa ha, you have a big help. !!!
$$a_n>0\\a_{n+1}=a_{n-1}^2$$is that what you're telling us?
yes
Well, presume our sequence converges to some non-zero value \(L\), i.e. \(\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}a_n=L\). Observe, then, that taking our recurrence relation in the limit gives:$$\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n+1}=\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n-1}^2\\L=L^2$$therefore either \(L=0\) or \(L=1\)
err converges to some value \(L\) **
We know that if \(a_1>1\) such a limit cannot exist, since then \(a_5>a_3>a_1\) etc. If \(a_1=1\) we observe that \(a_{2k+1}\) for integer \(k\) must be \(1\) and hence \(L=1\); for such a limit to exist we also require \(a_{2k}\to1\).
If we let \(0<a_1<1\) we observe \(a_5<a_3<a_1\) etc. hence \(a_{2k+1}\to0\); since this limit corresponds to \(L=0\) we then infer that \(a_{2k}\to0\) as well.
Intuitively then if \(a_1=1\) our sequence should converge to \(1\), which is nonzero.
what was this part ("err converges to some value L **)?
Note we took advantage of subsequence convergence...
@mathtutoring22 well if we presume \(a_n\to L\) for some real value \(L\) we find our recurrence relation tells us \(L=L^2\) which has only two solutions, \(L=0\) and \(L=1\)
I was correcting what I said earlier about \(L\) being nonzero
ok, thanks.
How do I prove that the limit ( as n goes to infinity) of 1/(nsin(n)) = 0? using l'hopital's or another rule
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac1{n\sin n}$$observe that since \(-1\le\sin n\le1\) we have \(-n\le n\sin n\le n\) for \(n\ge 0\). It follows that \(-\dfrac1n\ge\dfrac1{n\sin n}\ge\dfrac1n\). Now since in the limit as \(n\to\infty\) we have \(-\dfrac1n,\dfrac1n\to0\) so it follows that \(\dfrac1{n\sin n}\to 0\) -- this uses the 'squeeze' theorem
wow. thanks. i tried using l'hospital's rule but i couldn't prove it.
@mathtutoring22 are you sure it's \(a_{n+1}=(a_{n-1})^2\)... ? not, say, \(a_n=(a_{n-1})^2\) or \(a_{n+1}=a_n^2\)
\[_{a _{n=1}} = ^{a^2_{n}} -1\]
(a^2 subscript n) -1
@oldrin.bataku
OOOOOOOH
Alright, so we have \(a_{n+1}=a_n^2-1\). Observe that if \(a_n\to L\) for some finite \(L\) in the limit as \(n\to\infty\) our recurrence relation tells us:$$\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n+1}=\lim_{n\to\infty}(a_n^2-1)\\L=L^2-1\\L^2-L-1=0$$Ah, this problem is going to be fun ;-) can you recognize that polynomial?
(x - (1+√5)/2) (x- (1-√5)/2)?
well, one of its roots is \(\varphi\), the golden ratio, and its other is \(-\Phi\):$$L=\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-4(-1)}}2=\frac{1\pm\sqrt5}2\\\varphi=\frac{1+\sqrt5}2,-\Phi=\frac{1-\sqrt5}2$$
So clearly in the limit our value is either of \(\frac12(1\pm\sqrt5)\) if our sequence converges, and neither of those are \(0\), so we conclude our limit cannot conclude to \(0\)
oops -- actually, if \(a_1<1\) the above occurs; if \(a_1=1\) our series becomes alternating and fails to converge: \(1,0,-1,0,-1,0,-1,0,-1,\dots\)
and thats shows it?
well i showed the first part now relax
For the second part all we need to observe is that \(\varphi\) satisfies \(x=x^2-1\) (as we did above for \(L\)) so if we consider a constant sequence i.e. \(a_{n+1}=a_n\) we see that \(a_n=\varphi\) will give us a solution (so \(a_1=\varphi\)). If we could pick a negative \(a_1\), we could just use \(a_n=-\Phi\). http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a_1%3Dgolden+ratio%2C+a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%3Da_n%5E2+-+1 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a_1%3Dconjugate+golden+ratio%2C+a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%3Da_n%5E2+-+1
@oldrin.bataku you make us like high school students. hehehe. .. which school did you graduate?
@Loser66 I am a high school student :-p
if so, tell me what the school is, I turn down my degree, back there apply to be a high school student like you.
I have two final question.
the sequence \[_{a _{n}}\]
is define in the following way: for every positive integer n we set a subscript n to be the sum of the positive divisors of n, for example a subscript 10 = 1+2+5+10 = 18. show that lim(as n goes to infinity) a subscript n / n is not = 2
@oldrin.bataku
this is my second and last question:
@Loser66 haha I haven't learned this in school... but I have begun taking college classes as a high school student
$$a_n=\sum d_k$$where \(d_k\) is the \(k\)-th positive divisor of \(n\).
Well, first note we have \(a_p=p+1\) for all primes \(p\). Consider the infinite subsequence \(\{a_p\}\) of primes \(p\) and we see that since we have a infinitude of primes, \(p\) can grow arbitrarily large and thus \((p+1)/p=1+1/p\) will grow arbitrarily close to \(1\). Since thsi is not \(2\) we know \(\{a_n\}\) cannot converge to \(2\).
Well consider that for \(n=1\) we have \((1+x)(1+x^2)=1+x+x^2+x^3\).
Now, let's say it holds for some integer \(n\), i.e.$$(1+x)(1+x^2)\cdots(1+x^{2^n})=\sum_{k=0}^nx^k$$Consider that we can multiply by \((1+x^{2^{n+1}})\):$$(1+x)(1+x^2)\cdots(1+x^{2^{n+1}})=(1+x^{2^{n+1}})\sum_{k=0}^nx^k=\sum_{k=0}^nx^k+\sum_{k=0}^nx^{k+2^{n+1}}$$
oops i messed up
what the hell is \(m\)? from what I can tell we can let \(m=2^{n+1}-1\)
Okay, let's rewrite:$$(1+x)(1+x^2)\cdots(1+x^{2^n})=\sum_{k=0}^mx^k\\(1+x)(1+x^2)\cdots(1+x^{2^{n+1}})=(1+x^{2^{n+1}})\sum_{k=0}^mx^k=\sum_{k=0}^m x^k+\sum_{k=0}^mx^{k+2^{n+1}}$$note we can rewrite our latter sum:$$\sum_{k=0}^mx^{k+2^{n+1}}=\sum_{k=2^{n+1}}^{m+2^{n+1}}x^k$$
Since \(m=2^{n+1}-1\) we see our latter summation is really:$$\sum_{k=m+1}^{2m+1}x^k=\sum_{k=m+1}^{2^{n+2}-2+1}x^k=\sum_{k=m+1}^{2^{n+2}-1}x^k$$Combine our two sums:$$(1+x)(1+X^2)\cdots(1+x^{2^{n+1}})=\sum_{k=0}^{2^{n+2}-1}x^k$$and we see \(m_{n+1}=2^{n+1}-1\) giving us the form seen above; by the principle of induction we're done
thanks again @oldrin.bataku @loser66
I did nothing, me helpless, friend.
Where does the 2^n+1 comes from again, @oldrin.bataku @loser66
@mathtutoring22 it's just the "m" that satisfies the prompt
so replace 2^n+1 by m?
oops i wrote that backwards
What about this: prove that for every n>=, the number 11^n+1 + 12^2n-1 is divisible by 133. ( using math induction) I tried doing it but i made a mistake in the last part
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!