(Is my answer correct? ) Given: p is true Prove: p → q is true Assume p and ~q are both true. ~q → r, and r → ~p. Therefore, ~p and p cannot be true, so p and ~q cannot be true. Therefore, p → q is true. What type of proof is illustrated above? A.proof by contradiction C.proof by law of detachment D.proof by theorem
I think its law of detachement
something has to be missing why are they throwing r in there?
is this the full proof?
In logic, the law of detachment works with the statement "P implies Q". The law basically states that if you know the first part is true (P), then Q must be true. Syllogism works with the statements "P implies Q" and "Q implies R" (notice Q is mentioned twice). If both those statements are true, then the statement "P implies R" is true.
Yes.
well they point out that "~p and p cannot be true", so that's a contradiction
but this proof is just bizarre to be honest, not sure how they got what they got
So it should be proof by contradiction?
it's like they're making a lot of jumps
I think so
ok. thanks for your input.(:
besides, proof by law of detachment is a bit more straight forward than what they're saying so that's why I think we can eliminate it
Hmm..Sounds right. But i couldnt really understand this problem either.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!