Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@ivettef365 @whpalmer4
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Please help!
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
look at what you have - are there common factors between the two terms?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
3abx + 3ab?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
^not the answer
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
no, how about (x+1)?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
wait what? Im confused already...
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
it might be easier to see written this way:
(x+1)3ab +(x+1)(-2)
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
(I just reversed the order of the multiplications, which does not change the value)
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
isn't that the same as (x+1)(3ab-2)?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yesh
OpenStudy (anonymous):
3abx - 2x)(3ab - 2?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I dont know what to do with the x....
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
no, (x+1)(3ab-2) is the complete factoring
or if you prefer (3ab-2)(x+1)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
wait wha? :-?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
you're just undoing the distributive property here...
instead of going from \((p + q)(r + s) = p(r+s) + q(r+s) \) you are going the other way and taking \(p(r+s) + q(r+s) = (p+q)(r+s)\)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
oh ok
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
it's sometimes a little hard to see the opportunities to do this at first, because you're not used to going in that direction...
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah...
OpenStudy (whpalmer4):
there's a technique called factoring by grouping that uses this...
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!