(20.08) With over 50% of adults spending more than an hour a day on the Internet, the number experiencing computer- or Internet-based crime continues to rise. A survey in 2010 of a random sample of 1034 adults, aged 18 and older, reached by random digit dialing found 125 adults in the sample who said that they or a household member was a victim of a computer or Internet crime on their home computer in the past year.
the hint and formulas are below the question but im not getting any of the options... and i have 6 minutes to turn it in =/
ok i'll see what I can do
thanks
the 96% CI I'm getting is ( 0.100, 0.142 )
using the plus four method, I'm getting ( 0.101, 0.143)
They were correct :) ok, now that im not all in a rush, how did you get them?
for the first part p-hat = X/N = 125/1034 = 0.120889748549323
for the 96% confidence interval, the z critical value is roughly z = 2.05374891063182 this is the value of k such that P( -k < Z < k ) = 0.96
now we have enough info to compute the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval
Lower Bound of Confidence Interval L = phat - z*sqrt( (phat(1-phat))/n ) L = 0.120889748549323 - 2.05374891063182*sqrt( (0.120889748549323(1-0.120889748549323))/1034 ) L = 0.100068657367993 L = 0.100
ok..
Upper Bound of Confidence Interval U = phat + z*sqrt( (phat(1-phat))/n ) U = 0.120889748549323 + 2.05374891063182*sqrt( (0.120889748549323(1-0.120889748549323))/1034 ) U = 0.141710839730653 U = 0.142
so the 96% CI is (L,U) = ( 0.100, 0.142 )
the 96% CI for the plus four method will be calculated the exact same way..but... phat = (X+2)/(N+4) phat = (125+2)/(1034+4) phat = 0.1223506743738
make sense?
Yes, it all makes perfect sense, thanks!
ok great
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!