Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are rational expressions equivalent to their simplified forms?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am inclined to say yes but I'm not sure as they sometimes have different domains

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

due to the same reason, I'd say no :)

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

due to the constraints in the domain

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so why does the domain change once you simplify the expression?

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

well, the domain doesn't really change, for the original expression

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry, kind of confused. can you explain a little more because I don't want to seem like I don't know what I'm talking about when I answer this LOL

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

well, the obvious cases are rationals $$ \cfrac{x-3}{x^2-9} \implies \cfrac{x-3}{(x-3)(x+3)} \implies \cfrac{1}{x+3} $$ the original constraints, still remains that if x= 3, the denominator goes poof, and thus undefined even though the simplified version doesn't show that

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

wait.. 3 will yield 0/0 there, not a great example

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay I think I kind of understand. I've just always thought of them as equivalent so this is new to me

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

trying to think of a better example hehe but often times the constraints on either a root or an undefined, in the simplified version they get canceled out, and not show as in the original one but the domain constraints still apply to the original one, thus the simplified version follows the same constraints of the original

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay but they are not equivalent due to the fact that they don't show up in the simplified expression or they are because they are subject to the same domain constraints

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

$$ y = \cfrac{1}{\sqrt{2x}} \implies y^2 = \cfrac{1}{2x} $$ maybe a better example if you notice the original, it has the constraints that if "x" becomes negative the root turns to "i" or imaginary notice the simplified version doesn't show that it only shows a happy 1/2x whose domain is really \(\large (-\infty, +\infty)\)

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

they'd not be equivalent due to the discrepancies in domains otherwise, they're equal

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah okay thank you!

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

yw

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait! one more question

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isn't the example you just showed me irrational as it has a radical in the denominator

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

well, it could have been \(\large y = \sqrt{\cfrac{1}{2x}} \implies y = \cfrac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{2x}}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah okay so that is a rational expression then

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

yes, thus it expresses a "ratio" relationshiop, thus "ratio"nal

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

well, I used 1, but \(1^2 = 1\) so \(\sqrt{1} = \sqrt{1^2} \implies 1\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but don't the roots still end up becoming imaginary

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm prty sure even if u simplify like that, you still have to keep restrictions in place

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

they'd if "x" becomes negative, thus the domain constraint

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y^2=1/2(-1) y^2=-0.5 y=sqrt(-0.5)= i sqrt(0.5)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but with domain constraints, im inclined to say yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but you said that that one resulted in real roots with -infinity or i am misunderstanding which is probably the case

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where are u getting infinities olol, should i read up

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ya

OpenStudy (anonymous):

theres nothing wrong with imaginary roots? im just not seeing the infinity anywhere, unless this is somehow calc

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know theres nothing wrong with them but what i'm trying to say is that when I solve y=1/sqrt(2x) and y^2=1/2x i get the same roots

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and i thought i wasn't supposed to get an imaginary root with the second problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so don't they have the same domain constraints

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

hehe, no I said, that the simplified version doesn't show the restrictions on the domain for the original, and instead it was showing a domain of \(\large (-\infty, +\infty)\), which would make it non-equivalent to the original

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh okay

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so that where the infinities came from hahaha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay thanks guys

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!