Statistics Problem
Subjects with preexisting cardiovascular symptoms who were receiving subitramine, an appetite suppressant, were found to be at increased risk of cardiovascular events while taking the drug. The study included 9836 overweight or obese subjects with preexisting cardiovascular disease and/ or type 2 diabetes. The subjects were randomly assigned to subitramine (4823 subjects) or a placebo (5013 subjects) in a double-blind fashion. The primary outcome measured was the occurrence of any of the following events: nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or cardiovascular death. The primary outcome was observed in 570 subjects in the subitramine group and 482 subjects in the placebo group. Do the data give good reason to think that there is a difference between the proportions of treatment and placebo subjects who experienced the primary outcome? State hypotheses, find the test statistic and the P-value. Test statistic (0.001) z = P-value (0.001) =
for test statistic I got 3.5347
I thought p-value was .107 but its not
@jim_thompson5910 last one for tonight if you got the time please...seems like no one else has a clue =/
I think when it says "Test statistic (0.001) " it is saying to round the test statistic to the nearest thousandth (or 3 decimal places)
it did, but the site is weird, sometimes it rounds, sometimes not so I added the extra number instead of taking a chance, it usually doesn't count it wrong when I do that
but if im one number off then I get it wrong
hmm interesting, ok one sec
ok
I'm getting 3.53467921514759 for the test statistic, so you did that correctly
however you round it, not sure but you can always bring it up with your teacher and s/he'll know what to do
now the key to this whole test is figuring out what the null and alternate hypotheses are
Yeah, its the bad thing about online homework...
alright...
it says "Do the data give good reason to think that there is a difference between the proportions of treatment and placebo subjects who experienced the primary outcome?" so it wants to know if p1 = p2 or if p1 =/= p2
so Null: H0: p1 = p2 Alternate H1: p1 =/= p2
this means we have a 2 tailed test
not again... haha
yes revenge of the two tailed test lol
so we use this table http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~jrl/normal_cdf.pdf
ok, but we don't use the z that we got before, do we?
the table doesn't go high enough...
hmm let me see if I can find a larger table
I tried that before posting, so I figured I had to do something else
but what, I do not know
no you're just finding the area at this point
I guess we should use a calculator
and I got P(Z > 3.5347) = 2.041 * 10^(-4) = 0.0002041
now double this answer to get 2*0.0002041 = 0.0004082
so if you were to round that to 4 places, it would be p value = 0.0004
I think that's why they rounded earlier to 4 places if you rounded the p value to 3 places, you would get 0, which is an odd answer (but I guess it's valid somewhat)
hmm ok, I have an example, nearly the exact same as this one, and the p value was .001.... so Im wondering why this one is .0004 if the difference between the numbers of each problem was minimal
show me the example
in other words why its in the 4th decimal place not 3rd
ok let me attach it
well if it was 3 decimal places, then 0.0004082 ----> 0.000 = 0
I think they wanted the p value to be some number (other than 0)
wow that was horrible
lol a bit small...hmm
The subjects were randomly assigned to subitramine (5213 subjects) or a placebo (5020 subjects) in a double-blind fashion. The primary outcome measured was the occurrence of any of the following events: nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or cardiovascular death. The primary outcome was observed in 521 subjects in the subitramine group and 452 subjects in the placebo group.
k one sec
I'll be right back gotta drop someone off so I'll see your reply in a bit
ok take your time
well I'm getting 0.08778444061206 for the p value on this example so I'm not sure how they got 0.001, typo maybe?
I highly doubt it...
hmm seems odd how it's so off
I'm considering puuting .001 or .0004 50/50 if either is correct
but 0.001 is for the example, is there anything else to the example?
other than what you posted
there is, but its just the same top part as the one posted before
hmm well I'm not sure then
I submitted it as .0004 and it was correct :) I wonder how they got .001 before...
I used a few different calculators and I'm getting the same basic thing
who knows
well thanks!
sure thing
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!