Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 6 Online
OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

2(4-i) + (2-i)(3+i

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

This works pretty much like it would if i were a normal variable (like x) in algebra. The only 'weirdness' is the fact that \[\Large i^2 = -1\]

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

????????

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Right... \[\Large \color{green}2(4-i)+(2-i)(3+i)\] See that 2 I marked in green Distribute it over on this group:\[\Large \color{green}2\color{red}{(4-i)}+(2-i)(3+i)\]

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

yes

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes? Distribute it, what do you get?

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

\[(8-2i)+(2-i)(3+i)\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Good. Now What about this pair? You can use FOIL like you normally would if these were polynomials... \[\Large (8-2i)+\color{blue}{(2-i)(3+i)}\]

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

\[ummm (8-2i)+(6-i-i)?????\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I see... What if it were an x instead? \[\Large (2-x)(3+x)\] How would you FOIL this?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

<shrugs> whichever works, I guess. I can see that grouping is easier to apply. @jazzyfa30 ? Check that out ^

OpenStudy (jhannybean):

Oh my goodness....\[\large \color{green}2(3+i)-\color{green}i(3+i)\]

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

|dw:1373070796505:dw|

OpenStudy (jhannybean):

good job

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Oh, so you do remember your FOIL Great :) Now, apply it. First (product) plus Outer (product) plus Inner (product) plus Last terms (product)

OpenStudy (jazzyfa30):

um ok|dw:1373071055783:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!