Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Solve the equation.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{\ln2}^{x} \frac{ dx }{ \sqrt{e^x-1} } = \frac{ \pi }{6 }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

interesting

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How are you integrating with respect to the upper bound in your definite integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The upper limit is x. We get a value of x from that equation.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you know how to get \[\int \frac{\rm dx}{\sqrt{e^x - 1}}\] ??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

just the indefinite integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Working on that.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, substitue \[e^x-1 = t^2\] Then, \[dx = \frac{ 2t }{ 1+t^2 }dt\] I hope now its easy.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you implying that the integral is constant with respect to changes in its upper bound

OpenStudy (anonymous):

seems unlikely

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Hyun11 , we get a function in x after integrating.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

to solve x...the indefinite integral must be taken first...since you can just put in x later on. it's for simplification

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The upper bound of your integral is x!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Your free and bounded variables should not be the same, this is just bad ambiguous notation, change the variable your integrating with respect to, to $t$ or something.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

assuming you have \[\int_2^x 2xdx\] you can just solve int 2x first which is x^2 + c then plug in x... (x^2)- (4) something like that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

would you write \[\sum_{k=1}^k k\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, but in many books this is followed. My integration is correct, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{a}^x f(x)dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wonder how summations got in....anyway...let me see

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is the same pellet

OpenStudy (anonymous):

summation is used for discrete numbers...integration is for continuous functions...just because they both add means they're the same anyway...the sub seems right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am illustrating the ambiguity of his notation, not discussing partial sums.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok,thanks for help. I will search some books about this notation.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in improper integrals you denote it as \[\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \int_{-t}^{t} f(x)dx\] so i don't see why having variable bounds is ambiguous

OpenStudy (anonymous):

xlegendx, I don't know what you are talking about

OpenStudy (anonymous):

having variable bounds isn't ambigious

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then what are you implying to be ambiguous?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

having the same variable bound, as the variable your integrating with is ambigious

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{a}^x f(x) dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

would be tantamount to writing\[\sum_{k=1}^k k\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it would be ambiguous if you think you're going to get a constant answer.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

having an upper bound the same as your variable of integration doesn't make sense if there's no equal sign

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't think you understand what I am saying, we seem to be talking about totally different things

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think we are

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!