Solve the equation.
\[\int\limits_{\ln2}^{x} \frac{ dx }{ \sqrt{e^x-1} } = \frac{ \pi }{6 }\]
interesting
How are you integrating with respect to the upper bound in your definite integral
The upper limit is x. We get a value of x from that equation.
do you know how to get \[\int \frac{\rm dx}{\sqrt{e^x - 1}}\] ??
just the indefinite integral
Working on that.
Yeah, substitue \[e^x-1 = t^2\] Then, \[dx = \frac{ 2t }{ 1+t^2 }dt\] I hope now its easy.
Are you implying that the integral is constant with respect to changes in its upper bound
seems unlikely
@Hyun11 , we get a function in x after integrating.
to solve x...the indefinite integral must be taken first...since you can just put in x later on. it's for simplification
The upper bound of your integral is x!
yes.
Your free and bounded variables should not be the same, this is just bad ambiguous notation, change the variable your integrating with respect to, to $t$ or something.
assuming you have \[\int_2^x 2xdx\] you can just solve int 2x first which is x^2 + c then plug in x... (x^2)- (4) something like that
would you write \[\sum_{k=1}^k k\]
Yeah, but in many books this is followed. My integration is correct, right?
\[\int\limits_{a}^x f(x)dx\]
wonder how summations got in....anyway...let me see
is the same pellet
summation is used for discrete numbers...integration is for continuous functions...just because they both add means they're the same anyway...the sub seems right
I am illustrating the ambiguity of his notation, not discussing partial sums.
Ok,thanks for help. I will search some books about this notation.
in improper integrals you denote it as \[\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \int_{-t}^{t} f(x)dx\] so i don't see why having variable bounds is ambiguous
xlegendx, I don't know what you are talking about
having variable bounds isn't ambigious
then what are you implying to be ambiguous?
having the same variable bound, as the variable your integrating with is ambigious
\[\int\limits_{a}^x f(x) dx\]
would be tantamount to writing\[\sum_{k=1}^k k\]
it would be ambiguous if you think you're going to get a constant answer.
having an upper bound the same as your variable of integration doesn't make sense if there's no equal sign
I don't think you understand what I am saying, we seem to be talking about totally different things
i think we are
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!