group theory: test
@TonyJOu
ok tony stay in here
ok
\[\sum_{n=1}{\frac{1+2^{?}}{3^{n}}}\]
I cant see on my phone
that's almost there. It goes to infinity and the A sub n is 1 + 2^(n-1) / 3^n
ok, what
ok, what all test can you use?
I was thinking you could use Test for Divergence but I was thrown off because the numerator was 1+2^(n-1). Had it just been 1+2^n, I would have a limit of 2/3 because the degrees were the same.
\[\frac{1+2^{n-1}}{3^n}<\frac{2+2^{n-1}}{3^n}=\frac{2^1+2^{n-1}}{3^n}=\frac{2^{n}}{3^n}\]
and that is a geometric that converges, thus it converges by the comparison test.
lol, you are typing then erasing allot:)
it's the way that i'm trying to type this crap in. ;)
Where did the 2 come from?
I know, just type it as you would a ti-89
well I just used that to show that your sequence is less than (2/3)^n
The initial problem was 1+2^(n-1), then I noticed a 2 all of a sudden.
it didn't come from anywhere, its just the fact that \[\frac{1+2^{n-1}}{3^n}<\frac{2+2^{n-1}}{3^n}\]
So working with the geometric rules, are you stating that something converges if it is greater than or equal to -1 and less than or equal to 1?
we used algebra to show that your sequence a_n < (2/3)^n so sum a_n < sum (2/3)^n since we know sum (2/3)^n converges, we know that by the comparison test sum a_n must converge
so it converges to 2/3??
you are supposed to find the sum?
Yeah it said if it it's convergent, determine the sum.
ahh well (1+2^(n-1))/3^n = (1/3)^n+(2^(n-1))/3^n = (1/3)^n + (1/2)(2/3)^n
let me write this up and take a picture
ok
let me know if this makes since
give me a few minutes to mull it over. I didn't realize it was so involved.
its not really, its just break apart the fraction and then lil manipulation to get (2/3)^n
yeah take your time ill be around for a few hours
where did the ^n-1 that was in the numerator? In the third line down, I noticed it was gone. It became ^n.
well we have \[\frac{2}{2}*\frac{2^{n-1}}{3^n}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^1*2^{n-1}}{3^n}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{n-1+1}}{3^n}\]
ahhhh I got ya. I see.
I create the fraction (2/2) which is just 1, so it does not hurt to multiply by it then I factor out the bottom 2, and use the top one
you will use that trick allot..
And on the 4th line down, shouldn't it be (1/3)/1-(1/3)?
there was need to use the first method I showed with the comparison test, but make sure you understand it. this is a common thing to do when you need to show something is less than something else. (specifically that part where the 1 becomes 2).
it is, it just looks like 2
\[\frac{\frac{1}{3}}{1-\frac{1}{3}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\frac{2}{3}}{1-\frac{2}{3}}\]
to do a fraction \[\frac{1}{2}\.]
without the .
anyway, ok so you got it?
yeah man I got it. This is so much harder than 252 and 251. I understand this, it's just taking me a while with all these different tests for convergence and divergence.
yeah. well it goes to show that there are many different ways to show something converges. I first showed it with the comparison test, and then we used the fact that it was the sum of two geometric series. But once you told me that you needed to find the sum, I know then it must be geometric or telescopic (because these are the only two we know how to find the sum of). we know its not telescopic because its always positive. thus it must be geometric.
What is the test of two geometric series then? Meaning that once you knew we had to find the sum, where is the test for that?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!