"Consider the triangle ABC where BÂC = 70°, AB = 8cm and AC = 7cm. The point D on the side BC is such that BD/DC = 2. Determine the length of AD." I've done this about 10 times now and got roughly 6.32cm everytime, while the right correct asnwer should be 6.12cm. Any suggestions?
Could you draw out the figure for us first? :)
Sure :D
Does this look like it? |dw:1373820066667:dw|
Exactly like that, and waaay better than what I was drawing :P
Using the sine and cosine rules, I keep getting approx. 6.33 for AD, whereas it should be around 6.12 cm.
Since for triangle ABC you have 2 sides and an angle, you can use the law of cosines to find side AC. Then solve for angle C. Then with 2:1 ratio, you can find DC. Using angle C, DC and AC you can find AD.
Yes that is exactly what I did, yet my answer was still off about 0.2cm (without roudning). I was hoping if someone could do the calculations as well and verify whether my answer is correct or not.
I get BC = 8.643 cm
Yes I had that too
So far so good
DC = 8.643 cm/3 = 2.881 cm
m<C = 60.439 deg |dw:1373820966954:dw|
Yes I'm getting the same figures as you
This gives m<ADC = 95.4 deg
AD = 6.12 cm
Normally I would assume my answer is correct, but the weird thing is that this question is filed under the title "Complex numbers", as are all the complex-numbered questions before it, so I feel like I might be doing something wrong here since I haven't used any "i"s.
There are no complex numbers here. This is just a normal triangle that can be solved since we are given enough information.
I calculated AD using the sine rule without calculating ADC-angle, so would that be the problem?
What exactly did you use to calculate AD using the sine rule? I mean whcih sides and angles did you use?
I assumed that the angle DAC is 70/3. Is that the problem? Besides that I used the side DC, and angle ACB
so my equation was \[\frac{ \sin(DAC) }{ DC }=\frac{ \sin(ACB) }{ AD }\]
You can't assume that. In fact angle DAC turns out to be 24.2 deg which is not m<BAC/3.
Aaa I see. Can you also explain why that cannot be assumed? Since D cuts BC in a 2:1 ratio, I thought the line AD would divide the angle similarly.
And how did you calculate the angle ADC?
The only thing I know realetd to an angle about a triangle's side being cut into segments in a proportional way is when an angle bisector of a triangle is drawn to the opposite sides, the lengths of the segments are in proportion to the lengths of the adjacent sides.
Yeah now that I think about it it does make more sense that way
Now for angle ADC, let's just look at what we need: |dw:1373822050618:dw|
From here you can get AD directly just like we got BC directly in triangle ABC.
By the law of cosines, you can get AD = 6.12 cm directly.
Aaaa right, I totally missed that for some reason.
Thank you so much, your explanations were very detailed and a lot more than what I expected I'd get!
You're welcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!