What is the negation of the statement below: Given a sequence {a_n}, there exists a positive number M, such that |a_n| <= M for any n.
would it just be M, such that |a_n| > M?
there doesnt exist a positive number M such that |a_n| > M for any any n
NOT(given a sequence a(n), there exists a positive number M such that |a(n)| <= M for any n). So, given a sequence a(n), there DOES NOT exist a positive number M such that |a(n)| <= M for any n.
you have to flip the equality sign if you're negating the statement
Nope. We're not multiplying by -1. We're just negating the claim.
the negation of x <= 4 is x > 4 in x <= 4, then numbers 1,2,3, AND 4 all work to negate that, 1,2,3, AND 4 CAN'T work so to ensure that you must write x > 4
So, here's my take-away. I see your point, but I think -- and correct me if I'm wrong -- you mean to say in your first response: There DOES exist a positive number M such that |a_n| > M for any any n.
Err, no.
Sorry, I've confused things quite a bit.
You said "there doesnt exist a positive number M such that |a_n| > M for any any n". This seems to just be rephrasing the original claim: "there exists a positive number M such that |a_n| <= M"
okay yeah: There DOES exist a positive number M such that |a_n| > M for any any n. would be correct. I just proved it to myself using some predicate logic and law of equivalences.
okay so yall believe that my original conclusion was correct?
yup
thank okay.. if you have a little time, and know some history... please help out with the next question.
ill try
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!