Use a paragraph proof to prove the corresponding angles postulate: Given: segment A B is parallel to segment C D. Prove: Corresponding angles are congruent
are you familiar with indirect proofs?
Not really. I hate them. :/
here this might help i have to go
Hmm... if you're familiar with indirect proofs (contradiction), maybe this will help: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/MATH7200/Sect1.3.html Starting at "To prove Thm 1.18 with an indirect proof ..." Ill be back soon
Okay. Thanks.(:
Someone help?
One way you can go is this If AB || CD, then by the same side interior angles theorem, angles 3 and 6 are supplementary, so m < 3 + m < 6 = 180 angles 2 and 3 are a linear pair, so they are supplementary as well, ie m < 2 + m < 3 = 180 Now if you look at the two equations below m < 3 + m < 6 = 180 m < 2 + m < 3 = 180 you'll see that they both add to 180, so we can use substitution to get m < 3 + m < 6 = m < 2 + m < 3 then we can subtract m < 3 from both sides (ie use the additive property of equality) to get m < 6 = m < 2 So this proves that the corresponding angles 2 and 6 are congruent. You can use these steps to prove other pairs of corresponding angles are congruent as well.
I'm still confused. O_o
where are you stuck?
The additive property of equality part.
the additive property of equality is this if a = b then we can add any number (positive or negative) to both sides to get a+c = b+c
in this case, we're adding the negative version of angle 3 so we're effectively subtracting it from both sides really
But you said subtract, how is that additive?
adding a negative is the same as subtracting
ex: 1 + (-2) is the same as 1 - 2
you can use the subtraction property of equality, which says if a = b, then a - c = b - c if you're not sure about the additive property of equality
Okay.
either way, they basically say the same thing
Okay. Thank you.(:
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!