oko
since the zeros look to be integers, the discriminant should be a perfect square
it is a little hard to read, but it does say \((-7,0)\) and \((-3,0)\) right?
ok then the discriminant must be a perfect square and since the zeros are not at the vertex, that means it is not 0 that leaves 16
nevermind, hat was stupid question :)
The discriminant has to do with one part of the quadratic equation @malehuman01
if the discriminant was \(-13\) there would be no zeros
if the discriminant was \(15\) there would be two irrational zeros
or wait was it you @amandasoto144 that asked about the discriminant?
and if the discriminant was 0 it would have the vertex on the \(x\) axis
so it must be the only perfect square there other than zero, which is 16, yes
yes but nevermind :)
in fact, given the information you have from the graph we could find the discriminant for sure, but that is not necessary in this case
no
in that one the vertex is the same as the zero, i.e. the vertex is on the \(x\) axis
that means there is only one zero
quadratic formula tells you the zeros are \[\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\] and if this is only one number, it must be \(-\frac{b}{2a}\) and so \(b^2-4ac=0\)
in other words, if the vertex is on the \(x\) axis, meaning there is only one zero, the discriminant must be zero and the equation is in fact a perfect square, like say \(y=(x-3)^2\)
yes
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!