I'm wondering if I'm just missing something. I'm following the solution to a related rates problem, and everything makes sense up until one point (screenshot to be attached below).
I'm assuming I'm just looking over something really small, but I can't see how he could just go from tan(theta) to the value of cos(theta) without either using a trig identity, which wouldn't work here, or just using the pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse first.
(Just to be absolutely clear, virtually everything but what's in the red box makes sense to me. I don't need any help understanding the related rates problem itself.)
Well, initially cos^2(θ ) came about because after taking the derivative of tan(θ ) to get sec^2(θ ). Then dividing both sides by sec^2(θ ), he changed 1/(sec^2(θ )) into cos^2(θ ). As for the value of cos^2(θ ), that is a pythagorean theorem result. Given tanθ = 1000/500, you can solve for the hypotenuse using those two values. You get a hypotenuse of 500√(5). Then you find cos to be 500/(500√(5)) which gets you 1/√(5). Square it and you get your magical cos^2 number you had.
I get how cos^2(theta) came about. I understand how he got cos^2(theta). Again, I only didn't get how he (quickly) managed to square and factor 1000 and 500. This is a five minute problem, which is why I ask. So, nevermind, he just did use the pythagorean theorem, no FM involved.
you start with \[ \tan \theta = \frac{40 t^2}{500} \] evaluate at t= 5: \[ \tan \theta = \frac{40 \cdot 5 \cdot 5}{500} = \frac{200 \cdot \cancel{5}}{\cancel{500}100} = \frac{200}{100}=2\] now draw a right triangle, so that tan θ = 2: |dw:1374587936550:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!