A group of students designed an experiment with a thread and a rubber stopper. The steps of the experiment are listed below. Tie a rubber stopper to one end of a 20 cm long thread. Hold the other end of the thread and whirl it in a circle five times. Allow the thread to wind up on the finger. Observe that the rubber stopper moves faster as it comes nearer to the finger. The experiment most likely demonstrates Kepler's first law of planetary motion Kepler's second law of planetary motion Newton's second law of motion Newton's third law of motion
Can someone help please!!!! :(
@timo86m can you please help
@evilmath @Falco276
Do you think you know this one?
sorry i cant think so well about physics just now lol.
okay!
@thomaster help plzzz
okay
@nickirivera can you please help me please
okay hurry hurry
@thomaster I really need your help now!! :/
I'm sorry but I'm bad at physics...
okay, @theEric I need your help please!
@theEric
@theEric
@theEric I need u
some people change their mind more than they change their underwear! @evilmath
Thanks! @theEric I need your help
u there eric
I never learned this. I haven't learned astronomy things. But One of those laws seems to be right..
Which law do you think is right?
Well, I looked at that link @evilmath posted.
I don't see the info I need in there
Kepler 1. The path of the planets about the sun is elliptical in shape, with the center of the sun being located at one focus. (The Law of Ellipses) 2. An imaginary line drawn from the center of the sun to the center of the planet will sweep out equal areas in equal intervals of time. (The Law of Equal Areas)
@evilmath why?
is it B?
This little experiment also happens in the solar system, planets closer to the sun have shorter orbital periods than planets further away. Could this be Newton's inverse square law of gravity??
What?
I'm not sure I concur, @evilmath What does that law say, @Isaiah.Feynman ?
That rubber stopper, @evilmath , doesn't seem elliptical. It seems like a spiral. Not exactly an orbit.
I say B guys what would you say?
What would you say about B eric
@itsmylife what do you think about this?
Like I said, I haven't learned it and I haven't proved any to be necessarily correct.
@Isaiah.Feynman which would you say?
what are you trying to say @Isaiah.Feynman
@theEric the law states that the force between to masses is equal to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. So, I'm thinking that we imagine the finger to be the sun and the stopper be a planet. When the planet is farther it goes round the sun slower than when its nearer because the centripetal force in the thread becomes stronger as the stopper nears the finger! @superhelp101 I feel like the answer is not here.
That is a great explanation! I agree with this! But my concern is that I don't understand what law it is
do you have a suggestions eric
That was what @Isaiah.Feynman was saying. It's not one of Newton's three laws. As always, this answer is yours, and should reflect your abilities. Please read Kepler's first two laws and Newton's Second and Third Laws. And feel free to ask if you have any confusion!
I will thank you!
I don't get how 3 newton laws can't be it
Hmm?
wait it is A right??
@superhelp101 Don't worry Newton created another law just to explain planets going around the sun.
So what would you say the answer to be?
What do YOU think? What did you learn from that link from evilmath?
The only thing that I think explains that experiment seem to be this... \[F= G \frac{ m1m2 }{ r^{2} }\]
I see you closed the question. I hope you found your answer!
Oh yes I have it
@Isaiah.Feynman thank you so much
Cool! :)
@superhelp101 please what was the answer?
D of course according to your info :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!