Lets say we can drill a tunnel straight through north- and southpole. Describe the movement of a rock that falls from northpole. Lets say the earth has a homogenous density and discard friction. Calculate after how much time the stone reaches the mid-point of the earth.
i know i should use : K = GmMr/R^3
radius of the earth: 6371 km, mass: 5,9737.10^24
Just a suggestion: \[v=\frac{dy}{dt}\] Find an expression that defines the kinetic energy and thus speed at every point, then do an integral for y=R to 0. You should get an expression for time.
find an expression the defines kinetic energy..
you just mean the formula for kinet. en.?
yes.
why? i have the answer of one of my classmates and it doesn't look like he used kinetic energy formula anywhere
i see: \[\frac{ dm/dr*r }{ R^2 }\] and \[-kx=ma\]
and the first equation i posted
I have no idea what \[\frac{ dm/dr*r }{ R^2 }\] is supposed to do, but if you want there is another way using -kx=ma. Recall what g is in terms of G, M and R. \[g=\frac{MG_{E}}{R^{2}}\] Thus, Force becomes: \[F=-mg\frac{r}{R}\] This looks similar to hooke's law:\[F=-kx\] Which you will find that:\[k=\frac{mg}{R}\] For spring oscillations,angular frequency is: \[\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\]\[T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{mR}{mg}}\] This expression is for 1 compelte oscillation, so half of it is:\[t=\pi\sqrt{\frac{R}{g}}\]
wow, alright
I would do it like this: \[dy=\frac{ adt^2 }{ 2 }=\frac{ GMdt^2 }{ 2y^2 }\] \[2dyy^2=GMdt^2 \rightarrow 2 \int\limits_{0}^{R}y^2dy=GM \int\limits_{0}^{t}dt^2\] \[\frac{ 2R^3 }{ 3 }=GMt^2 \rightarrow t=\sqrt{\frac{ 2R^3 }{3GM }}=657,65 s\]
could you explain hooke's law? what is k and x?
Well, you threw out the idea of :−kx=ma... Hooke's law states that the restoring force is proportional to the displacement x. this proportionality constant is k. @Fifciol i'll try to make sense of that :P
restoring force..proportionality constant... alright...
@Fifciol you used the kinematic equation for dy?
then dt^2 so it's a function of time...?
I used kinematic equation and dt^2 is differential
alright
and a = GM/y^2 ???
yes
how'd you think of that?
F=ma=mg
F=GMm/y^2=ma
y is the radius, right?
distance
R would be at surface of the earth
oooh ok
so you described the movement using kinematic equations, then integrated to know the time?
yes
got it, i think it's correct. Unless @Festinger has a different answer?
I'm not sure the first equation I wrote down
Even my first suggestion gave me a different expression.
@Mashy any thoughts?
@amistre64 is that correct: \[dy=\frac{ adt^2 }{ 2 }\] ?
if a is constant, it is right?
i havent really learned to model differential equations
wouldnt this act like a pendulum tho? or are we trying to determine when itll first reach the center?
when it will reach the center
I am unsure if \[\int_{0}^{t}dt^{2}=t^{2}\] is a legal move....
and there is some relation to the inverse of a square of a distance right?
Fificiol is wrong.. cause the mass of the earth is not a constant as you go down the earth..
i mean the effective mass that provides the gravitational force :P
doesnt assuming homogenous density and whatnot mean that we are simplifying all the complexity from it?
yesyes
yes.. so u need to get mass as a function of distance.. use the densitiy as a constant.. and get a function for mass in terms of M and R
it has homogenous density, and when you deal with gravity and planets you can treat the mass as if all of it were at center
While true that:\[\int d(t^{2})=t^{2}+c\] is true, but in this case it is actually: \[\int (dt)^{2}\]
@fificiol.. as you go inside the earth, the gravitational force decreases.. in your equation u should modify M m = My^3/R^3...
because according to your equation, the force keeps increasing as you go inside the earth.. so you get a huge error.. u ll get acceleration to be increasing.. infact the acceleration is decreasing! ^_^
i think.. everything else holds..!!
Mashy is right.
i'm seeing this equation from my classmate: \[m.a=\frac{ G.m.M }{ R^3 }\]
times r
yes, Mashy you're right
\[m.a=\frac{ G.m.M }{ R^3 } . r\]
so...what now?
follow what i posted for now until someone comes with a better solution. i am uncomfortable with the pi appearing...
ok
but i would really suggest you go back to look at hooke's law. your friend seems to know hooke's law.
i don't understand how it applies to this
the expression that you posted that your friend wrote ma=-kx gave me the idea to link hooke's law and gravity in this case. the equation of force shows that it is proportional to r, like the x that appears in hooke's law. after that i just rode on the results from hooke's law with spring oscillations.
i see, you used it for the proportionality
My new way of thinking on this problem: |dw:1375972009210:dw| \[ma=-kx \rightarrow x''+\frac{ k }{m }x=0\] \[\frac{ GMm }{ R^2 }=kR \rightarrow k=\frac{ GMm }{ R^3 }\] \[x''+\frac{ GM }{ R^3 }x=0 \rightarrow T=2\pi \sqrt{\frac{ R^3 }{ GM }}\] \[t=\frac{T }{ 4 }=\frac{ \pi }{ 2 }\sqrt{\frac{ R^3 }{ GM }}\]
Yes, you are right. It should be divided by 4 instead of 2. My bad.
why?
One oscillation is from one end > center > another end > center > original end when i divided by 2 it is the solution to: one end > center > another end
and you need, one end>center ?
|dw:1375972875468:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!