Circulation, Curl, and Stokes Theorem troubles
I have a problem and a solution attached below, but I am having trouble understanding it. The formula for curl that I am using is also attached below. My question is:
When I apply the formula for curl to the vector field, I get what they give in the solution.
@dan815 , is it because on the second line it is dotted with dS, and somehow dS becomes <2x, -2y, 1> dA?
hello again
so what are you confused about
R(x,y)=<x,y,y^2-x^2> <--- you must get your normal vector from this Rx=<1,0,-2x> Ry=<0,1,2y> Rx X Ry =<2x,-2y,1>
that is your normal vector not normalized tho
in this case we actually dont need to normalize, i assume you know why so moving on...
now you just do doubleintegral CurlF dot<2x,-2y,1> da where da is the unit circle so lets bet to convert to polar now
best*
for questions like this the trickiest part is just parametrizing
Sorry, I am having connection issues, thanks for the reply, that helps a lot!
are you solid with this stuff
i can refer you to some great lectures if you dont know the theory about why we are cross to get the little surface elements and stuff
or why stokes theorem ends up giving you the line integral of the boundary curve
Thanks but thats ok. I have a final on this stuff so Im just working through last minute problems, trying to make sure I get it.
I just don't understand what happens with dA. Why we use the cross production of the partials of one of the surfaces and not the other... Ug, Im hopeless lol
Ug nevermind, I get it. Once you dot the curl with whatever Rx X Ry is called, then the 2nd surface comes into play as a bound. Finally think I understand.
|dw:1376022773357:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!