for the function u=t^3/2 show that the derivative does not exist at t=0 but that the right-hand derivative exist at that point
yes
Are you expected to use the limit definition for this? Or can you use the friendly rules of differentiation?
im expected to use the limit of definition
\[\large u(t)=t^{3/2}\] Using the Limit Definition of the Derivative:\[\large u'(t)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(t+h)^{3/2}-t^{3/2}}{h}\] And from here, let's seeee.
Multiplying the top and bottom by the `conjugate of the top` gives us,\[\large u'(t)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(t+h)^{3/2}-t^{3/2}}{h}\left(\frac{(t+h)^{3/2}+t^{3/2}}{(t+h)^{3/2}+t^{3/2}}\right)\] \[\large u'(t)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(t+h)^3-t^3}{h\left[(t+h)^{3/2}+t^{3/2}\right]}\]
Understand that step? It's a little tricky :o
Err hmm, maybe we don't need to go into all of that.. maybe we can simply do this,
no, i think we're on the right track..
the multiplication of the conjugate top is confusing can you elaborate further please :)
Normally when we multiply conjugates it's a little more straight forward, like this:\[\large (a-b)(a+b) \qquad=\qquad a^2-b^2\] But in our case we have something like this:\[\large \left(a^{3/2}-b^{3/2}\right)\left(a^{3/2}+b^{3/2}\right) \qquad=\qquad \left(a^{3/2}\right)^2-\left(b^{3/2}\right)^2\] When we have an exponent with another exponent being applied like this, our rules of exponents tell us to `multiply the exponents`\[\large \frac{3}{2}\cdot 2 \qquad=\qquad 3\]So we're ending up with,\[\large a^3-b^3\]
too much? did your head esplode?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!