Can someone check my solution, please
of course eigenvectors are not unique
normally if two eigenvalues are the same you can't use e^(landa*t)*eigenvector have you learned picart algotithm
on my paper, that's the way I figure out the second eigenvector from the available one(I mean eigenvector from eigenvalue 2)
by that way my third solution is linearly independent to the second one
you should have 3 different linearly indepe. sol
I'm not sure.. have you learned picart algotithm ?
the first one is linearly independent to the second one already, since they come from 2 different eigenvalues
no , I didn't
himm..
I'll be back
ok, I have to get home, I ll back when I get home. See you
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x%27%3Dx%2Cy%27%3D3y%2Bz%2Cz%27%3D-y%2Bz
sorry the name of the method is putzer algorithm http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Putzer_Algorithm_for_Matrix_Exponentials
do you have any example in your lecture note one has the same eigenvalue..
I'll check my prof's stuff and when he did on his way, his own result is different from wolfram. That's why mine stuff doesn't match to it. But as long as mine matches his, I am ok, right?
@e.mccormick this is one of program I wrote last spring from java course
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!