A system of equations is given as follows: x+y+2z=1 kx+2y+4z=k For what values of k does the system have an infinite number of solutions? Determine the solution to the system for this value of k.
Well, infinite solutions means you do elimination or substiution and you end up with 2 sides being perfectly equal. It means they'll be the same line essentially. So we want values of k that can either make everything cancel or make both sides equal after we do elimination. So it looks like, based on the y and z values, that our k line may just be a multiple of 2 of the first line. So if we let k = 2, we get: x + y + 2z = 1 2x + 2y + 4z = 2 Now this looks perfect. By elimination method, multiply the top equation by -2 and eliminate everything :3
yes! I'm right(^_^) thanks, just confirming if I understand this correctly..
Yeah, np :P Did we leave our vectors section? xD
nope, this is still vectors, planes and etc.
Ah, okay xD Yeah, Im still stuck there....because im going slow, haha. Almost on to the next section in the chapter -_-
good for you!☺, i'm waiting for you a while ago, to answer my questions:)
Well, whatever you got that needs answering :3
Determine the vector equation of the line that passes through A(-2, 3,6) and is parallel to the line of intersection of the planes \[\pi _{1}:2x-y+z=0\] and \[\pi _{2}: y+4z=0\]
Well, the line of intersection of theplanes requires a system of equations using the two plane equations themselves. From there we need tosolve for x, y, and z and put it in terms of t so we can have the line in parametricform.
brb, i need to do something..
kkz
, i'm back:) i'm doing another question and i'm stuck this is the question: determine the solution of this system of equation: 2x-y+2z=2 and -x+2y+z=1
All it says is solution, it doesnt say line of intersection or anything?
nope..
Yeah, often times you find a line of intersection solution. Alright, lemme take a look then.
sure:)
Yeah, I can get ya a line of intersection in parametric form, but if thats what is needed, doubt it, lol.
that's fine.. let me see:)
looks like it is a very long solution XD
So this is kind of a way you would go about finding a line of intersection. The first thing we do is eliminate one of the 3 variables and then choose to solve for one of the remaining two variables. It is not necessary that we come up with a numerical solution, just need to solve for a variable. Once we solve for a variable, we substitute this into one of the two original plane equations and solve for one of the other variables. The second variable we solve for, say we get x = z/7, we let that z/7 value = t. Then we solve for all 3 variables in terms of t. You'll understand the process as we go, though. 2x - y + 2z = 2 -x + 2y + z = -1 So we can just eliminate one of the variables to start with. I'll just eliminate y by multiplying the top plane by 2 4x - 2y + 4z = 4 -x + 2y + z = -1 = 3x + 5z = 3 So now we can just solve for either variable. I'll just solve for x saying: \[x=\frac{ 3-5z }{ 3 }\] So this x value is substituted into one of the two plane equations. Since the bottom equation only has a negative x I can do that one: \[-\frac{ 3-5z }{ 3 }+2y+z=-1\] = - 3 + 5z + 6y + 3z = -3 8z + 6y = 0 \[z=\frac{ -3y }{ 4 }\] Now we say that t = -3y/4 Therefore z = t y = -4t/3 x= 1- 5t/3 Kinda messy ish, but thats kinda the method xDD
Oh WOW!=O give me time to read this
Yeah, np xD
aah, I found my mistake, instead of multiplying first equation by 2, I multiply -2 to the second one:) thanks again..
i mean 2.. to eliminate x
Lol, easy to make mistakes for sure xD
i wish i could be like you:)
Lol, got many people on here way more advanced in math than I am, though, lol.
at least your very helpful to me,XD
I try xD Just got a lot to learn, lol.
lol, I peek to the next section, IT'S THREE PLANES!, it looks very hard O_0, did you do three planes?
Nope. Ive been going too slow. Ive been doing, like, all the rpoblems in this one section because I need to get it down xD
same here:)
wait, i checked the answer, it's different.. x=5/4 s y=s z=1-3/4 s
They solved for different variables. Its the same thing, but they have y as the main instead of z like we had.
ok?, i'll check again
Can just solve for different variables and see what happens. Im not sure if theres a requirement or specific way to say solve for THIS ONE
i got \[x=\frac{ 5-5z }{ 3}\]?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!